From: Bas Spitters <spitters@cs.ru.nl>
To: Dusko Pavlovic <dusko@kestrel.edu>
Subject: Re: Logical consequences of descent theory
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:34:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1NdY9e-0005ZD-Kx@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9dbab7b1002030657x1918bbffh2c26d4ff0596e1@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Dusko,
Thanks. This is interesting, did the Hyland/Moerdijk manuscript you
cite ever appear?
However, maybe I should have phrased my question as:
Barr's theorem has an interesting logical corollary.
This corollary has been used (impressively) by people like Mulvey,
Vermeulen and Wraith to obtain mathematical results.
I understood that it was suggested that a similar use has been made of
descent theory.
Maybe I misunderstood.
Best,
Bas
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Dusko Pavlovic <dusko@kestrel.edu> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2010, at 6:57 AM, Bas Spitters wrote:
>
>> A number of people have suggested that descent theory has been/ can be
>> used to obtain logical results.
>
> [snip]
>>
>> Any suggestions or pointers about the logical interpretation of
>> descent theory would be appreciated.
>
> long long time ago there was a paper about the logical meaning of descent
> with the beck-chevalley condition:
>
> @inproceedings{PavlovicD:interpolation,
> author = "Dusko Pavlovic",
> title = "Categorical interpolation: descent and the
> Beck-Chevalley condition without direct images",
> booktitle = "Category Theory, Proceedings, Como 1990",
> editor = "A.~Carboni et al.",
> publisher = "Springer Verlag",
> series = LNM,
> volume = "1488",
> pages = "306--326",
> year = "1991"
> }
>
> more interestingly, one can also go back, and work out the exact logical
> conditions for descent, which are weaker than the beck-chevalley.
>
> -- dusko
>
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-05 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 14:57 Bas Spitters
2010-02-03 20:02 ` Dusko Pavlovic
2010-02-05 8:34 ` Bas Spitters [this message]
2010-02-08 1:18 ` Marek Zawadowski
2010-02-12 15:01 ` William Boshuck
2010-02-13 17:40 ` Colin McLarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1NdY9e-0005ZD-Kx@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=spitters@cs.ru.nl \
--cc=dusko@kestrel.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).