categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bas Spitters <spitters@cs.ru.nl>
To: Dusko Pavlovic <dusko@kestrel.edu>
Subject: Re: Logical consequences of descent theory
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:34:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1NdY9e-0005ZD-Kx@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9dbab7b1002030657x1918bbffh2c26d4ff0596e1@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Dusko,

Thanks. This is interesting, did the Hyland/Moerdijk manuscript you
cite ever appear?

However, maybe I should have phrased my question as:
Barr's theorem has an interesting logical corollary.
This corollary has been used (impressively) by people like Mulvey,
Vermeulen and Wraith to obtain mathematical results.

I understood that it was suggested that a similar use has been made of
descent theory.
Maybe I misunderstood.

Best,

Bas

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Dusko Pavlovic <dusko@kestrel.edu> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2010, at 6:57 AM, Bas Spitters wrote:
>
>> A number of people have suggested that descent theory has been/ can be
>> used to obtain logical results.
>
> [snip]
>>
>> Any suggestions or pointers about the logical interpretation of
>> descent theory would be appreciated.
>
> long long time ago there was a paper about the logical meaning of descent
> with the beck-chevalley condition:
>
> @inproceedings{PavlovicD:interpolation,
>  author =       "Dusko Pavlovic",
>  title =        "Categorical interpolation: descent and the
>                  Beck-Chevalley condition without direct images",
>  booktitle =    "Category Theory, Proceedings, Como 1990",
>  editor =       "A.~Carboni et al.",
>  publisher =    "Springer Verlag",
>  series =    LNM,
>  volume =    "1488",
>  pages =        "306--326",
>  year =         "1991"
> }
>
> more interestingly, one can also go back, and work out the exact logical
> conditions for descent, which are weaker than the beck-chevalley.
>
> -- dusko
>
>


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-05  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-03 14:57 Bas Spitters
2010-02-03 20:02 ` Dusko Pavlovic
2010-02-05  8:34 ` Bas Spitters [this message]
2010-02-08  1:18   ` Marek Zawadowski
2010-02-12 15:01     ` William Boshuck
2010-02-13 17:40       ` Colin McLarty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1NdY9e-0005ZD-Kx@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=spitters@cs.ru.nl \
    --cc=dusko@kestrel.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).