From: David Yetter <dyetter@math.ksu.edu>
To: Categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: bilax monoidal functors
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 20:05:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1OAsOI-0001WM-Ro@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
John Baez could not recall whether bilax and Frobenius monoidal functors =
are the same.
The answer is no, in the usage I'd been familiar with, bilax meant =
simply equipped with both lax and oplax structures, while a Frobenius =
monoidal functor satisfies additional coherence relation which =
generalize the relations between the multiplication and comultiplication =
in a Frobenius algebra.
A bilax monoidal functor from the one-object monoidal category to VECT =
would be a vector-space with both an algebra and a coalgebra structure =
on it (no coherence relations relating them), while a Frobenius monoidal =
functor would be a Frobenius algebra. =20
Aguiar (with good reason), on the other hand, reserves bilax for =
functors equipped with coherence relations generalizing the relations =
between the operations and cooperations in a bialgebra, so that a bilax =
functor from the one-object monoidal category to VECT would be a =
bialgebra. This notion, however, only makes sense in the presence of =
braidings on the source and target.
I think Aguiar's usage should prevail, though we also need a name for =
functors between general monoidal categories which are simultaneously =
lax and oplax.
Best Thoughts,
David Yetter=
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-08 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-08 1:05 David Yetter [this message]
2010-05-10 16:14 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-16 23:57 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Richard Garner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-15 16:23 bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-11 8:28 bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-15 16:54 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-11 1:04 bilax_monoidal_functors Fred E.J. Linton
2010-05-09 16:26 bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-10 19:28 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-13 17:17 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
2010-05-15 1:05 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
2010-05-08 3:27 RE : bilax monoidal functors John Baez
2010-05-10 10:28 ` Urs Schreiber
2010-05-11 3:17 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
2010-05-14 14:34 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
2010-05-07 18:03 bilax monoidal functors John Baez
2010-05-08 2:23 ` Andre Joyal
2010-05-08 23:11 ` Michael Batanin
2010-05-10 16:12 ` Toby Bartels
[not found] ` <4BE5EF9C.1060907@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-08 23:34 ` John Baez
2010-05-08 9:38 ` Steve Lack
[not found] ` <C80B6E26.B13C%s.lack@uws.edu.au>
2010-05-08 23:19 ` John Baez
2010-05-06 23:02 Q. about " Steve Lack
2010-05-07 14:59 ` bilax " Joyal, André
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1OAsOI-0001WM-Ro@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=dyetter@math.ksu.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).