From: Jeff Egger <jeffegger@yahoo.ca>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>,
Dusko Pavlovic <Dusko.Pavlovic@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: autonomous terminology: WAS: bilax monoidal functors
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:40:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1OBdGa-0002Ut-26@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1OBEGh-0000ho-BF@mailserv.mta.ca>
Hi Dusko,
> i am reluctant call them dagger star autonomous categories,
> because it is a mouthful.
Perhaps it's a symptom of growing up in a country where
"Kangiqsualujjuaq" is considered a perfectly acceptable
name for a village, but I don't think that "dagger star-
autonomous" is a mouthful. It's only one syllable longer
than "sesquipedalian", and one less than "linearly
distributive", neither of which I would hesitate to use
in day-to-day conversation, should the occasion arise.
It even scans nicely.
Moreover, it communicates something (at least to me); for
better or worse, both "dagger" and "star-autonomous" are
both established terms, and I can see how they might be
combined. Agglutination, though often mocked, is often
effective.
> so now, what should we call those "dagger star autonomous
> categories" if
> we don't want to type 30 characters each time we mention
> them?
One of the many curious features of the English language is
that adjectives are never inflected; assuming you use TeX,
why not take advantage of this fact in your source code?
\def\dsa{dagger star-autonomous}
> peter suggests DSA-categories.
If you're publishing in a print journal, or a conference
proceedings with a hard page-limit, then that seems sensible
(though I'd drop the hyphen). Otherwise, do us all a favour
and stick to the long form: pixels are cheap, as editors of
TAC are wont to say.
> (maybe someone will abbreviate them to D-categories...)
What's the point of that? D-category could stand for (just
plain old) dagger category, or differential category, or any
number of other things. But maybe someone some day will
\def\dsa{Pavlovic}.
Cheers,
Jeff.
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-10 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-08 3:27 RE : " John Baez
2010-05-09 10:38 ` autonomous terminology: WAS: " Dusko Pavlovic
2010-05-09 22:41 ` Colin McLarty
2010-05-10 12:09 ` posina
2010-05-10 17:40 ` Jeff Egger [this message]
2010-05-09 16:26 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-10 14:58 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Eduardo J. Dubuc
2010-05-10 19:28 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-13 17:17 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
2010-05-14 14:43 ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Peter Selinger
2010-05-15 19:52 ` terminology Toby Bartels
2010-05-15 1:05 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
[not found] ` <20100514144324.D83A35C275@chase.mathstat.dal.ca>
2010-05-15 4:41 ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Michael Shulman
2010-05-10 10:28 ` bilax monoidal functors Urs Schreiber
2010-05-11 3:17 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
[not found] ` <4BE81F26.4020903@dm.uba.ar>
2010-05-10 18:16 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= John Baez
2010-05-11 1:04 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Shulman
2010-05-12 20:02 ` calculus, homotopy theory and more Andre Joyal
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F6@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F8@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13 6:56 ` calculus, homotopy theory and more (corrected) Michael Batanin
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57FE@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13 22:59 ` Michael Batanin
[not found] ` <4BEC846B.5050000@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14 2:53 ` Andre Joyal
2010-05-11 8:28 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-12 3:02 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Toby Bartels
2010-05-13 23:09 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-15 16:05 ` terminology Joyal, André
[not found] ` <4BEC8698.3090408@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14 18:41 ` bilax_monoidal_functors? Toby Bartels
2010-05-15 16:54 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-14 14:34 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
2010-05-11 22:04 autonomous terminology: WAS: bilax monoidal functors Dusko Pavlovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1OBdGa-0002Ut-26@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=jeffegger@yahoo.ca \
--cc=Dusko.Pavlovic@comlab.ox.ac.uk \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).