categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toby Bartels <toby+categories@ugcs.caltech.edu>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: bilax_monoidal_functors?=
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:02:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1OCXvf-0006gG-DX@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1OBzhU-0007X1-2F@mailserv.mta.ca>

Michael Batanin wrote in part:

>I agree that it creates some clash in low dimensions but I think it is
>not a big deal since classical terminology does not have numbers (nobody
>calls a monoidal category 0-braided or symmeteic monoidal category
>2-braided monoidal). The low dimensional cases are important but they
>are not always good models for higher dimension. As an example, -2 and
>-1 categories as Baez and Dolan pointed out can be understood as one
>pointed set and two pointed set correspondingly. Should we shift the
>numbers and call category a 3-category?

No, but it seems to me that you are doing something very much like this.

The concept of n-category makes sense for n as low as -2,
so it would be nice to renumber this so that we start at n = 0.
However, if we do so, then we need a word other than "-category";
if "category" = "3-category", then this violates "foo" = "1-foo".

Similarly, the concept of k-braided MC makes sense for k = -1,
so it would be nice to renumber this so that we start at k = 0.
However, if we do so, then we need a word other than "-braided MC";
if "braided MC" = "2-braided MC", then this violates "foo" = "1-foo".

So either we stick with Andre's numbering, inelegant as may be,
or we change Andre's "-braided MC" to John's "-tuply MC".
But you say, no, we do not need "foo" = "1-foo",
simply renumber so that "braided MC" = "2-braided MC".
That is like saying, renumber so that "category" = "3-category".
While it is a more elegant numbering, it is likely to be confusing.

I will say no more about it.  I will be happy to read your papers,
as long as you explain your terminology up front, as we all should.
I may grumble to myself at your violation of "foo" = "1-foo",
but I will nevertheless understand since you have explained.
(But if you later post to the categories list about it,
  then I may be confused if you don't recall the numbering.)


--Toby


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-12  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-08  3:27 RE : bilax monoidal functors John Baez
2010-05-09 10:38 ` autonomous terminology: WAS: " Dusko Pavlovic
2010-05-09 22:41   ` Colin McLarty
2010-05-10 12:09   ` posina
2010-05-10 17:40   ` Jeff Egger
2010-05-09 16:26 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-10 14:58   ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Eduardo J. Dubuc
2010-05-10 19:28   ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-13 17:17     ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
2010-05-14 14:43       ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Peter Selinger
2010-05-15 19:52         ` terminology Toby Bartels
2010-05-15  1:05       ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
     [not found]       ` <20100514144324.D83A35C275@chase.mathstat.dal.ca>
2010-05-15  4:41         ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Michael Shulman
2010-05-10 10:28 ` bilax monoidal functors Urs Schreiber
2010-05-11  3:17   ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
     [not found] ` <4BE81F26.4020903@dm.uba.ar>
2010-05-10 18:16   ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= John Baez
2010-05-11  1:04     ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Shulman
2010-05-12 20:02       ` calculus, homotopy theory and more Andre Joyal
     [not found]       ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F6@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
     [not found]         ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F8@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13  6:56           ` calculus, homotopy theory and more (corrected) Michael Batanin
     [not found]             ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57FE@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13 22:59               ` Michael Batanin
     [not found]               ` <4BEC846B.5050000@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14  2:53                 ` Andre Joyal
2010-05-11  8:28     ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-12  3:02       ` Toby Bartels [this message]
2010-05-13 23:09         ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-15 16:05           ` terminology Joyal, André
     [not found]         ` <4BEC8698.3090408@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14 18:41           ` bilax_monoidal_functors? Toby Bartels
2010-05-15 16:54       ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-14 14:34 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-08  1:05 bilax monoidal functors David Yetter
2010-05-10 16:14 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-16 23:57   ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Richard Garner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1OCXvf-0006gG-DX@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=toby+categories@ugcs.caltech.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).