categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Shulman <shulman@uchicago.edu>
To: Michael Batanin <mbatanin@ics.mq.edu.au>
Subject: Re: bilax_monoidal_functors
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:34:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ODKqU-00067V-Ll@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1OAsS6-0001ay-ER@mailserv.mta.ca>

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Michael Batanin <mbatanin@ics.mq.edu.au> wrote:
> Concerning n-braided categories versus (n+1)-fold categories. Yes, I
> would be happy to use (n+1)-fold terminology but it also clashes with
> iterated monoidal categories of BFSW as I said.

No one has suggested "(n+1)-fold monoidal" categories for that very
reason.  The terminology being suggested is "(n+1)-tuply monoidal."

Mike


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-14 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-08  3:27 RE : bilax monoidal functors John Baez
2010-05-09 10:38 ` autonomous terminology: WAS: " Dusko Pavlovic
2010-05-09 22:41   ` Colin McLarty
2010-05-10 12:09   ` posina
2010-05-10 17:40   ` Jeff Egger
2010-05-09 16:26 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-10 14:58   ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Eduardo J. Dubuc
2010-05-10 19:28   ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-13 17:17     ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
2010-05-14 14:43       ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Peter Selinger
2010-05-15 19:52         ` terminology Toby Bartels
2010-05-15  1:05       ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
     [not found]       ` <20100514144324.D83A35C275@chase.mathstat.dal.ca>
2010-05-15  4:41         ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Michael Shulman
2010-05-10 10:28 ` bilax monoidal functors Urs Schreiber
2010-05-11  3:17   ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
     [not found] ` <4BE81F26.4020903@dm.uba.ar>
2010-05-10 18:16   ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= John Baez
2010-05-11  1:04     ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Shulman
2010-05-12 20:02       ` calculus, homotopy theory and more Andre Joyal
     [not found]       ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F6@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
     [not found]         ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F8@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13  6:56           ` calculus, homotopy theory and more (corrected) Michael Batanin
     [not found]             ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57FE@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13 22:59               ` Michael Batanin
     [not found]               ` <4BEC846B.5050000@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14  2:53                 ` Andre Joyal
2010-05-11  8:28     ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-12  3:02       ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Toby Bartels
2010-05-13 23:09         ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-15 16:05           ` terminology Joyal, André
     [not found]         ` <4BEC8698.3090408@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14 18:41           ` bilax_monoidal_functors? Toby Bartels
2010-05-15 16:54       ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-14 14:34 ` Michael Shulman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-15 16:23 bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-11  1:04 bilax_monoidal_functors Fred E.J. Linton
2010-05-08  1:05 bilax monoidal functors David Yetter
2010-05-07 18:03 John Baez
2010-05-08  2:23 ` Andre Joyal
2010-05-08 23:11   ` Michael Batanin
2010-05-10 16:12     ` Toby Bartels
     [not found]   ` <4BE5EF9C.1060907@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-08 23:34     ` John Baez
2010-05-08  9:38 ` Steve Lack
     [not found] ` <C80B6E26.B13C%s.lack@uws.edu.au>
2010-05-08 23:19   ` John Baez
2010-05-06 23:02 Q. about " Steve Lack
2010-05-07 14:59 ` bilax " Joyal, André

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1ODKqU-00067V-Ll@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=shulman@uchicago.edu \
    --cc=mbatanin@ics.mq.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).