From: Toby Bartels <toby+categories@ugcs.caltech.edu>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: bilax_monoidal_functors?
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:41:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ODKsa-00069O-AC@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BEC8698.3090408@ics.mq.edu.au>
Michael Batanin wrote:
>If we follow the principle "foo = 1 foo" and want to agree
>with historical low dimensional terminology we should call categories
>2-sets. Set = 1 Set. So, categories = 2 Set. Nobody will do it I guess.
Sorry, but I don't think that you understand what we (Mike and I) mean
when we say that "foo" should equal "1-foo".
In all of these examples, the word "1-foo" (or "1-tuply foo")
means the same as the historic low-dimensional term "foo":
* "n-category", with the usual meaning;
* "n-set", as you suggested above;
* "k-tuply monoidal", as used by John Baez;
* "k-braided monoidal", as used by Andre Joyal;
* "n-stack", with the usual meaning;
* "n-sheaf", as Mike Shulman suggested.
In only these examples, the word "1-foo" does ~not~ mean the same as "foo":
* "n-connected space", with the usual meaning;
* "n-category", with the new meaning that you suggested earlier;
* "k-braided monoidal", as you used it here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/5764/.
I like some of the terms in the first list more than others.
I find some of them sensibly numbered and some of them not
(which is part, but not all, of what goes into my liking them).
But I find all of them usable and I instantly understand them.
I object to the terms in the second list as inherently confusing,
even when I find them sensibly numbered. Of the terms on that list,
only "n-connected space" has actually been sanctioned by history.
(But see http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/k-simply+connected+n-category
for an alternative approach.)
--Toby
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-08 3:27 RE : bilax monoidal functors John Baez
2010-05-09 10:38 ` autonomous terminology: WAS: " Dusko Pavlovic
2010-05-09 22:41 ` Colin McLarty
2010-05-10 12:09 ` posina
2010-05-10 17:40 ` Jeff Egger
2010-05-09 16:26 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-10 14:58 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Eduardo J. Dubuc
2010-05-10 19:28 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-13 17:17 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
2010-05-14 14:43 ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Peter Selinger
2010-05-15 19:52 ` terminology Toby Bartels
2010-05-15 1:05 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
[not found] ` <20100514144324.D83A35C275@chase.mathstat.dal.ca>
2010-05-15 4:41 ` terminology (was: bilax_monoidal_functors) Michael Shulman
2010-05-10 10:28 ` bilax monoidal functors Urs Schreiber
2010-05-11 3:17 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Andre Joyal
[not found] ` <4BE81F26.4020903@dm.uba.ar>
2010-05-10 18:16 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= John Baez
2010-05-11 1:04 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Shulman
2010-05-12 20:02 ` calculus, homotopy theory and more Andre Joyal
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F6@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57F8@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13 6:56 ` calculus, homotopy theory and more (corrected) Michael Batanin
[not found] ` <B3C24EA955FF0C4EA14658997CD3E25E370F57FE@CAHIER.gst.uqam.ca>
2010-05-13 22:59 ` Michael Batanin
[not found] ` <4BEC846B.5050000@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14 2:53 ` Andre Joyal
2010-05-11 8:28 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-12 3:02 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Toby Bartels
2010-05-13 23:09 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Michael Batanin
2010-05-15 16:05 ` terminology Joyal, André
[not found] ` <4BEC8698.3090408@ics.mq.edu.au>
2010-05-14 18:41 ` Toby Bartels [this message]
2010-05-15 16:54 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Jeff Egger
2010-05-14 14:34 ` bilax_monoidal_functors Michael Shulman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-08 1:05 bilax monoidal functors David Yetter
2010-05-10 16:14 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Andre Joyal
2010-05-16 23:57 ` bilax_monoidal_functors?= Richard Garner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1ODKsa-00069O-AC@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=toby+categories@ugcs.caltech.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).