categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jim stasheff <jds@math.upenn.edu>
To: Urs Schreiber <urs.schreiber@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Straw man terminology
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:28:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1OIOdS-0005el-Kz@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1OHdDy-0006Ey-J4@mailserv.mta.ca>

Urs Schreiber wrote:
> Dear Andre,
>
>
>> I agree that the terminology (infinity,1)-terminology can be useful.
>>
>
> Okay.
>
>
>> Can I point out that Lurie is calling a quasi-category an infinity-category?
>>
>
> Okay, let's look at Lurie's use of terminology then. Notice that just
> a little later in
>
>    On the classification of TFTs
>    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0905/0905.0465v1.pdf#page=31
>
> In the remark 2.1.26 he speaks of
>
>   "the various models of the theory of (oo,1)-categories"
>
> referring to Julie Bergner's article which shows that
> quasi-categories, sSet-categories, Segal categories and complete Segal
> spaces give four equivalent such models.
>
> Then still a bit later in
>
>    (oo,2)-Categories and the Goodwillie calculus
>    http://www.math.harvard.edu/~lurie/papers/GoodwillieI.pdf
>
> he uses terminology exactly as I have been suggesting in my previous messages:
>
> starting in the third sentence:
>
>   "Let us use the term (oo,n)-category to indicate a higher category in
> which all k-morphisms are assumed to be invertible for k> n.
>
>
>

THIS IS MUCH BETTER - A DEFINITION - NOT AN EXAMPLE (AKA MODEL) OR 
APPROACH

>    [...]
>
>   The theory of (oo,1)-categories is also quite well understood, though
> in this case there is a variety of possible approaches. [...] These
> are known as quasicategories in the literature; we will follow the
> terminology of [HTT] and refer to them simply as oo-categories."
>
>
> So, for what it's worth, Lurie adopts the convention that I was
> talking about, it seems to me: to say (oo,n)-category for the general
> concept and use other terms for concrete models. He just happens to
> have the extra convention that "oo-category" (without the ",1") is his
> term for the model that you called quasi-category.
>
> Maybe in this context it is noteworthy that in this last article
> alone, there is presented literally a dozen of different and
> equivalent models for (oo,2)-categories.
>
> Best,
> Urs
>

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-27 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-26 17:59 Urs Schreiber
2010-05-27 15:55 ` zoran skoda
2010-05-27 22:28 ` jim stasheff [this message]
2010-05-27 22:30 ` jim stasheff
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-27  8:44 Urs Schreiber
     [not found] <AANLkTimkcg8A7yvuwGUgijWkkzXRFqkYU6o3kY5GXdP1@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-27  3:31 ` Joyal, André
2010-05-22 16:42 Peter May
2010-05-24 13:07 ` Urs Schreiber
2010-05-26 13:48   ` Joyal, André

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1OIOdS-0005el-Kz@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=jds@math.upenn.edu \
    --cc=urs.schreiber@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).