categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Garner <r.h.g.garner@gmail.com>
To: Categories mailing list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Tensor of monads
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:13:55 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Ofu8B-0006iP-MA@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin5+paq8sP-eVjdf8rZOyA-z=t6QzAhCqVUsyQi@mail.gmail.com>

Further to my earlier question:

   -- Given idempotent monads S, T on a category C for which we can speak of
> the tensor of S and T, is it always the case that S * T is isomorphic to S +
> T?
>

I think I'm now happy that the answer is "no". Consider, as in my previous
message, a presheaf category [D^op, Set]. Let S and T be the idempotent
monads corresponding to two
Grothendieck topologies J and J' on [D^op, Set]. Then S + T is the monad
whose algebras are presheaves which are simultaneously J-sheaves and
J'-sheaves. On the other hand,
S * T has as algebras those presheaves X which are both J-sheaves and
J'-sheaves, but which satisfy an additional axiom (*). This axiom may be
expressed most expediently when D has finite products; so let us assume that
now. The condition says:

(*) Let f_i : U_i --> U be J-covering, and let g_k : V_k --> V be
J'-covering. Let ( x_ik \in X(U_i x V_k) ) be a compatible family for ( f_i
x g_k : U_i x V_j --> U x V ). Then the two natural ways of patching to an
element of X(U x V) agree.

These two ways of patching are as follows. For the first, note that since (
f_i x V_k | i \in I ) is J-covering for each k in K, we may patch to obtain
elements ( y_k \in X(U x V_k) | k \in K ). Then since ( U x g_k | k \in K )
is J'-covering, we may patch these to obtain an element z \in X(U x V). For
the second way of patching, we proceed entirely analogously, but this time
going via a family ( y'_i \in X(U_i x V) | i \in I).

Now (*) is a genuine extra condition which as far as I can see is not a
consequence of being both a J-sheaf and a J'-sheaf, so that S + T algebras
are not the same as S * T algebras. Note, however, that (*) _is_ a
consequence of being a (J n J')-sheaf, since ( f_i x g_j ) is covering in J
n J'. On the other hand, I'm not sure if (*) implies being a (J n J')-sheaf,
as I conjectured in my previous message; I don't have an Elephant to hand to
check.

Richard


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-01  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-28 14:02 Sergey Goncharov
2010-07-29  8:21 ` N.Bowler
2010-07-29  9:18 ` Prof. Peter Johnstone
2010-07-29 10:29 ` Michael Barr
2010-07-31  8:45   ` Richard Garner
     [not found]   ` <AANLkTinxyVQ1fXu7DLWu4CUF3AP2KPX6PLQFDB+zG4Ef@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-31 12:48     ` Michael Barr
     [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1007291006210.5174@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
2010-07-29 13:24   ` Prof. Peter Johnstone
     [not found]   ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1007291422370.5174@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
2010-07-30  1:02     ` Sergey Goncharov
2010-07-31 20:34       ` Eckmann-Hilton (Was: Tensor of monads) Toby Bartels
     [not found]     ` <4C5224A4.4000105@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
2010-07-30 10:37       ` Tensor of monads Prof. Peter Johnstone
2010-07-30 22:41         ` Tom Leinster
2010-08-01 19:49           ` Ronnie Brown
2010-08-02  9:47           ` Ronnie Brown
2010-08-01  0:31         ` Richard Garner
2010-08-02 19:55           ` Paul Levy
2010-08-03  6:39             ` Richard Garner
     [not found]             ` <AANLkTimd202AX=3hUqU9ABkKUy9Z4Loh1RXTiDgVZ3Ku@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-03 11:03               ` Paul Levy
2010-08-09 20:26                 ` Paul Levy
2010-08-05 20:06           ` Sergey Goncharov
2010-08-08 19:24             ` Gordon Plotkin
2010-07-30  3:44 ` Joyal, André
     [not found] ` <AANLkTin5+paq8sP-eVjdf8rZOyA-z=t6QzAhCqVUsyQi@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-01  9:13   ` Richard Garner [this message]
2010-08-02 14:17     ` Prof. Peter Johnstone
     [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1008021514290.18118@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
2010-08-02 21:12   ` Richard Garner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Ofu8B-0006iP-MA@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=r.h.g.garner@gmail.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).