categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Baez <baez@math.ucr.edu>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Makkai's suggestion
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:53:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Oq7Cg-0001fQ-Ne@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikK_KK3qHEJOewHY+c7u5=PYBs3JBjFrXX0ag_J@mail.gmail.com>

David Leduc wrote:

In "Towards a categorical foundation of mathematics", Makkai wrote that:
>
> "This suggests that, possibly, the right approach to the definition of weak
> n-category is to aim at formulating all coherence conditions at once,
> regardless the fact that this might give a very "theoretical" definition.
> It
> would then be a separate, and still very important, project to find a
> (hopefully) finite and concise set of coherence conditions that would be
> enough to imply all coherence conditions."
>
> It was 15 years ago! Did this approach give something?
>

Yes: most or all of the successful approaches to infinity-categories follow
a philosophy of this general sort.  You can find a lot of references here:

http://ncatlab.org/johnbaez/show/Towards+Higher+Categories

Best,
jb


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-30  4:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-29  5:26 David Leduc
2010-08-30  4:53 ` John Baez [this message]
2010-08-31  1:01   ` David Leduc
     [not found] ` <AANLkTimDqh1tCxooE_Kca_SHPxN3sqC80d08zQcZ1Cx+@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-31  4:34   ` John Baez
2010-09-01 21:42     ` Greg Meredith
     [not found] ` <AANLkTinMcT+eTMb03vo2a7f4ud-xtv-E8_gvXy=VPhXF@mail.gmail.com>
2010-09-06 17:08   ` Greg Meredith
2010-09-03  4:04 John Baez
2010-09-04 17:16 ` Ronnie Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Oq7Cg-0001fQ-Ne@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=baez@math.ucr.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).