* First erratum
@ 2010-09-05 0:43 Michael Barr
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Barr @ 2010-09-05 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Categories list
George Janelidze just wrote to tell me that the definition of equivalence
of categories is wrong. Yes, and it is wrong in the original too. The
corrected version, with a new footnote is in the latest version, just
posted. George further requested that I maintain a list of errata so if
you find an error you can refer to that list before sending it to me.
Instead, since I will post a new version whenever I get and correct an
error, please just check your errors against the latest version.
I don't know how many times, I read G's definition of categorical
equivalence, not realzing that it was insufficient.
Michael
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-09-05 0:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-05 0:43 First erratum Michael Barr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).