From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/6139 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Leduc Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Evil in bicategories Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:27:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20100911232358.GA32145@ugcs.caltech.edu> Reply-To: David Leduc NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284320628 3137 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2010 19:43:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: categories To: Toby Bartels , droberts@maths.adelaide.edu.au Original-X-From: majordomo@mlist.mta.ca Sun Sep 12 21:43:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gsmc-categories@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from smtpy.mta.ca ([138.73.1.139]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OusSo-0003Oh-8t for gsmc-categories@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:43:46 +0200 Original-Received: from mlist.mta.ca ([138.73.1.63]:55361) by smtpy.mta.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OusRb-0005Bb-8O; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:42:31 -0300 Original-Received: from majordomo by mlist.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OusRV-0001qY-FS for categories-list@mlist.mta.ca; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:42:25 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20100911232358.GA32145@ugcs.caltech.edu> Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:6139 Archived-At: Hi Toby and David, Toby Bartels wrote: > The non-evil algebraic definitions of higher categories > are based on dependent type theory, You both mention a definition of higher categories based on dependent type theory. Where does it appear? I cannot find such definition in the guide book by Cheng and Lauda. Can/has it be implemented in a proof assistant like Coq? [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]