From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/6172
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Michael Shulman <shulman@math.uchicago.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories
Subject: Re: errata
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:48:37 -0700
Message-ID: <E1Ow1jE-0002Tq-Ts@mlist.mta.ca>
References: <E1OvUSu-0003FE-Gi@mlist.mta.ca>
Reply-To: Michael Shulman <shulman@math.uchicago.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284594656 15936 80.91.229.12 (15 Sep 2010 23:50:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:50:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Eduardo J. Dubuc" <edubuc@dm.uba.ar>, Categories list <categories@mta.ca>
To: David Roberts <droberts@maths.adelaide.edu.au>
Original-X-From: majordomo@mlist.mta.ca Thu Sep 16 01:50:55 2010
Return-path: <majordomo@mlist.mta.ca>
Envelope-to: gsmc-categories@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from smtpy.mta.ca ([138.73.1.139])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <majordomo@mlist.mta.ca>)
	id 1Ow1kX-0004lB-Jz
	for gsmc-categories@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:50:49 +0200
Original-Received: from mlist.mta.ca ([138.73.1.63]:47171)
	by smtpy.mta.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <majordomo@mlist.mta.ca>)
	id 1Ow1jL-0007jN-HM; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:49:35 -0300
Original-Received: from majordomo by mlist.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <majordomo@mlist.mta.ca>)
	id 1Ow1jE-0002Tq-Ts
	for categories-list@mlist.mta.ca; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:49:29 -0300
In-Reply-To: <E1OvefY-0002jM-1o@mlist.mta.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:6172
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/6172>

And of course instead of "evil" one could say "treif".

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:10 PM, David Roberts
<droberts@maths.adelaide.edu.au> wrote:
> Actually this is the sort of thing I was trying to think of - it
> shifts the focus to the positive (we can talk about kosher, as opposed
> to 'non-evil'). It also has an element of incongruity, so that like
> 'evil' people stop for a moment and go 'hang on...'. And like the
> concept of kosher, people who are not that way inclined can live quite
> happily without it.
>
> David
>
>
> On 14 September 2010 10:32, Eduardo J. Dubuc <edubuc@dm.uba.ar> wrote:
>> of course, =A0 I meant =A0"not kosher' or "non kosher"

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]