From: "Prof. Peter Johnstone" <P.T.Johnstone@dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
To: Thomas Streicher <streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: are fibrations evil?
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:00:54 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1OwQJp-0002jW-Sq@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Ow1kx-0002Vi-3Z@mlist.mta.ca>
Yes, fibrations in the original sense of Grothendieck are "evil"
(sorry, Jean!), as is shown by the fact that an equivalence of
categories is not in general a fibration. There is a weaker notion
of fibration in which one replaces the equality "P\phi = u" by a
(specified) isomorphism PY -> J making the obvious triangle
commute. But every fibration in this sense factors as an equivalence
followed by a fibration in Grothendieck's sense, so it's not
such an important notion.
Peter Johnstone
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Thomas Streicher wrote:
> On the occasion of the discussion about "evil" I want to point out an example
> where speaking about equality of objects seems to be indispensible.
> If P : XX -> BB is a functor and one wants to say that it is a fibration
> then one is inclined to formulate this as follows
>
> if u : J -> I is a map in BB and PX = I then there exists a morphism
> \phi : Y -> X with P\phi = u and \phi cartesian, i.e. ...
>
> I don't see how to avoid reference to equality of objects in this formulation.
>
> This already happens if XX and BB are groupoids where P : XX -> BB is a
> fibration iff for all u : J -> I in BB and PX = I there is a map \phi : Y -> X
> with P\phi = u.
>
> Ironically the category of groupoids and fibrations of groupoids as families
> of types was the first example of a model of type theory where equality may
> be interpreted as being isomorphic.
>
> So my conclusion is that equality of objects is sometimes absolutely
> necessary. Avoiding reference to equality is also not a question of using
> dependent types as some people implicitly seem to say. Even in intensional
> type theory there is a notion of equality. But it is sometimes inconvenient
> to use. As pointed out by Ahrens one can and should use extensional type theory
> whenever convenient.
> Intensional type theory allows one to interpret equality as being isomorphic,
> a kind of reward for the inconvenience of using intensional identity types.
>
> Thomas
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-16 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-15 11:43 Thomas Streicher
2010-09-16 0:28 ` Michael Shulman
2010-09-16 1:14 ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2010-09-16 5:14 ` Is equality evil? Vaughan Pratt
2010-09-17 8:28 ` Toby Bartels
2010-09-18 14:11 ` Thomas Streicher
2010-09-19 20:30 ` Erik Palmgren
2010-09-24 12:50 ` Bas Spitters
[not found] ` <20100918141110.GC9467@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2010-09-22 4:00 ` Toby Bartels
2010-09-25 16:18 ` Michael Shulman
[not found] ` <20100922040041.GB14958@ugcs.caltech.edu>
2010-09-22 10:27 ` Thomas Streicher
2010-09-16 8:50 ` why it matters that fibrations are "evil" Thomas Streicher
[not found] ` <AANLkTinosTZ2NQW9biPxiwpX9zPi5m=kwvA16nHjK=Xu@mail.gmail.com>
2010-09-16 9:47 ` are fibrations evil? Thomas Streicher
2010-09-16 10:00 ` Prof. Peter Johnstone [this message]
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1009161023190.12162@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
2010-09-16 10:46 ` Thomas Streicher
2010-09-17 7:44 ` Toby Bartels
[not found] ` <20100916094755.GA19976@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2010-09-17 5:01 ` Michael Shulman
2010-09-18 13:48 ` Thomas Streicher
[not found] ` <20100918134829.GB9467@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2010-09-20 16:25 ` Michael Shulman
2010-09-17 2:17 David Roberts
2010-09-17 4:36 John Baez
2010-09-18 13:50 ` Joyal, André
2010-09-19 14:57 ` David Yetter
[not found] ` <F8DA87C6-CBED-44AE-B964-B766A95D8417@math.ksu.edu>
2010-09-19 18:21 ` Joyal, André
2010-09-20 17:04 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
2010-09-20 16:59 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
2010-09-22 2:52 ` Toby Bartels
[not found] ` <20100922025245.GA14958@ugcs.caltech.edu>
2010-09-22 18:56 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
[not found] ` <4C9A5156.3010307@dm.uba.ar>
2010-09-22 21:06 ` Toby Bartels
2010-09-24 23:43 Fred E.J. Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1OwQJp-0002jW-Sq@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=p.t.johnstone@dpmms.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).