categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Shulman <shulman@math.uchicago.edu>
To: Thomas Streicher <streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: Re: are fibrations evil?
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:25:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1OyDx9-00048K-7l@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100918134829.GB9467@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Thomas Streicher
<streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> But what I do not see is a correspondence between kosher and
> non-kosher versions. If you start with a collection CC of 1-cells in a 2-cat
> like Cat and close it under equivalences thus obtaining CC' I don't see any
> way of reconstructing CC from CC' in a canonical way.

I didn't mean to imply that there was.  In general, a given kosher
concept may correspond to more than one non-kosher concept.  For
instance, the notion of "weak n-category" is believed to be
"semi-strictifiable" in multiple incompatible ways.  It's known for
n=3 that one can either make associativity and units strict but keep
interchange weak, or make associativity and interchange strict but
keep units weak, but one cannot make everything strict.  However, if
we choose a particular corresponding non-kosher concept, then we can
talk about (semi)strictification of individual objects.

Mike


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-20 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-15 11:43 Thomas Streicher
2010-09-16  0:28 ` Michael Shulman
2010-09-16  1:14 ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2010-09-16  5:14 ` Is equality evil? Vaughan Pratt
2010-09-17  8:28   ` Toby Bartels
2010-09-18 14:11     ` Thomas Streicher
2010-09-19 20:30       ` Erik Palmgren
2010-09-24 12:50       ` Bas Spitters
     [not found]     ` <20100918141110.GC9467@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2010-09-22  4:00       ` Toby Bartels
2010-09-25 16:18         ` Michael Shulman
     [not found]       ` <20100922040041.GB14958@ugcs.caltech.edu>
2010-09-22 10:27         ` Thomas Streicher
2010-09-16  8:50 ` why it matters that fibrations are "evil" Thomas Streicher
     [not found] ` <AANLkTinosTZ2NQW9biPxiwpX9zPi5m=kwvA16nHjK=Xu@mail.gmail.com>
2010-09-16  9:47   ` are fibrations evil? Thomas Streicher
2010-09-16 10:00 ` Prof. Peter Johnstone
     [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1009161023190.12162@siskin.dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
2010-09-16 10:46   ` Thomas Streicher
2010-09-17  7:44     ` Toby Bartels
     [not found] ` <20100916094755.GA19976@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2010-09-17  5:01   ` Michael Shulman
2010-09-18 13:48     ` Thomas Streicher
     [not found] ` <20100918134829.GB9467@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2010-09-20 16:25   ` Michael Shulman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1OyDx9-00048K-7l@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=shulman@math.uchicago.edu \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).