categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Lack <steve.lack@mq.edu.au>
To: "Ellis D. Cooper" <xtalv1@netropolis.net>
Cc: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re:  Severe Strict Monoidal Category Naivete
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:54:21 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1POh9F-0002LE-O8@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1POLYs-0002gh-3u@mlist.mta.ca>

Dear Ellis,

On 03/12/2010, at 1:55 AM, Ellis D. Cooper wrote:

> (1) Is strict monoidal category the same as monoid in category of categories?

Yes. 

> (2) Is it not true that in a strict monoidal category if
> $X\xrightarrow{f}Y\xrightarrow{g}Z$ then $f\square g= g\circ f$?
 
If I understand correctly, you have arrows f:X->Y and g:Y->Z and you 
are comparing the tensor products f@g:X@Y->Y@Z and g@f:Y@X->Z@Y.
They have different domain and codomain, so cannot be equal.

If you considered a commutative monoid in the category of categories, then these arrows would be equal. But such commutative monoids are very rare. 

> (3) Is the pentagon axiom automatically satisfied in a strict
> monoidal category?
> 

Yes. In that case it asserts that two identity arrows with the same domain and codomain
are equal. 


Steve Lack.

> Many thanks for your patience and pointers.
> 
> 


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-03  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-02 14:55 Ellis D. Cooper
2010-12-03  2:54 ` Steve Lack [this message]
     [not found] ` <8C65074A-894A-4F7A-B47D-9D8411A9CFC3@mq.edu.au>
2010-12-03 15:51   ` Ellis D. Cooper
2010-12-04 14:00 ` Ellis D. Cooper
     [not found] <E1POk5N-0004lN-Lv@mlist.mta.ca>
     [not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.00.1012041110000.9194@mlist.mta.ca>
2010-12-04 23:44   ` David Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1POh9F-0002LE-O8@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=steve.lack@mq.edu.au \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=xtalv1@netropolis.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).