categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ronnie Brown <ronnie.profbrown@btinternet.com>
To: Ondrej Rypacek <ondrej.rypacek@gmail.com>
Cc: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: double 2-categories
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:13:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1PQ9wp-0006f3-VO@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1PPxIg-0005a7-3R@mlist.mta.ca>

I am not sure why there is the restriction to having 2-categories as
edge arrows. They could be double categories, perhaps.  Would this then
be any more general than a 4-fold category?

A definition of n-fold category is given in

34.  (with P.J. HIGGINS), ``The equivalence of $\infty$-groupoids and
crossed  complexes'', {\em Cah. Top. G\'eom. Diff.} 22 (1981)
371-386.

and this also contains a definition of what was later called a globular
set, giving a notion of what we now call a strict globular n-category,
though the emphasis in the paper is on the groupoid case.

Ronnie

On 07/12/2010 12:59, Ondrej Rypacek wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Is there a standard reference for what could be called a double-2-category,
> by which I mean a double category where the categories of horizontal and
> vertical arrows are 2-categories ?
> It would be a special case of a "triple category", I guess, where
> there are objects, arrows in three directions, cells for each distinct
> pair of the directions, and cubes surrounded by cells.
>
>
> Many thanks,
> Ondrej
>

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-07 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-07 12:59 Ondrej Rypacek
2010-12-07 14:13 ` Ronnie Brown [this message]
2010-12-09  9:36   ` Ross Street
     [not found] ` <4CFE4105.5020902@btinternet.com>
2010-12-07 16:08   ` Ondrej Rypacek
2010-12-07 18:35 ` Jeff Egger
     [not found] ` <456981.42294.qm@web110605.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
     [not found]   ` <16A709CA-BA0D-4E71-8994-F700356973D3@gmail.com>
2010-12-07 19:31     ` Ondrej Rypacek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1PQ9wp-0006f3-VO@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=ronnie.profbrown@btinternet.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=ondrej.rypacek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).