categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fred E.J. Linton" <fejlinton@usa.net>
To: <categories@mta.ca>
Cc: Jeff Egger <jeffegger@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: Stone duality for generalized Boolean algebras
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:38:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1PhMsf-0000zH-8i@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)

On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 05:11:26 PM EST, Jeff Egger <jeffegger@yahoo.ca> responded
to Andrej Bauer <andrej.bauer@andrej.com> as follows:

> There is an analogous problem when trying to "extend" Gelfand duality to
> locally compact Hausdorff spaces and (not necessarily unital)  C*-algebras:
> everything works fine on the object level, but there are many  (not
> necessarily unital) *-homomorphisms C_0(1) --> C_0(2), but only one
> continuous map 2 --> 1.  The standard solution, IIRC, is to restrict the
> class of *-homomorphisms to those which "preserve the approximate
unit". ...

Another approach more closely resembles the "solution" that George 
Janelidze and I have pointed out for the Boolean problem. To sketch it, 
let me temporarily borrow the old Gelfand-Naimark terminology "normed ring" 
for commutative C*-algebras with unit, and use "normed rng" for their 
not-necessarily-unital counterparts.

As in the Boolean setting, then, "normed rngs" is, to within equivalence,
augmented "normed rings" (that is, the slice category "normed rings"|'C',
where C is the "coefficient ring" -- probably the real or the complex 
field in most applications), whence as opposite to "normed rngs" one
immediately deduces the category of pointed compact Hausdorff spaces
(and *all* continuous base-point-preserving functions).

And, as there also, while the complement of the base point in such a
space may be locally compact, the passage to that complement is, again, 
far from functorial -- unless one is willing either to restrict one's
attention, among maps of pointed compact spaces, to those that send
*only* the base point to the base point, or to extend one's attention to
certain only partially defined functions as maps of locally compact spaces.

Cheers, -- Fred



[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2011-01-23 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-23 15:38 Fred E.J. Linton [this message]
2011-01-24 21:15 ` George Janelidze
2011-01-26  0:51   ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
2011-01-26 17:19   ` F. William Lawvere
2011-01-27  2:41     ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-22 18:47 Jeff Egger
2011-01-21 22:39 Fred E.J. Linton
2011-01-21 13:19 Andrej Bauer
2011-01-21 23:06 ` George Janelidze
2011-01-23  4:06 ` Yoshihiro Maruyama

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1PhMsf-0000zH-8i@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=fejlinton@usa.net \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=jeffegger@yahoo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).