From: "Fred E.J. Linton" <fejlinton@usa.net>
To: <categories@mta.ca>
Cc: Jeff Egger <jeffegger@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: Stone duality for generalized Boolean algebras
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:38:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1PhMsf-0000zH-8i@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 05:11:26 PM EST, Jeff Egger <jeffegger@yahoo.ca> responded
to Andrej Bauer <andrej.bauer@andrej.com> as follows:
> There is an analogous problem when trying to "extend" Gelfand duality to
> locally compact Hausdorff spaces and (not necessarily unital) C*-algebras:
> everything works fine on the object level, but there are many (not
> necessarily unital) *-homomorphisms C_0(1) --> C_0(2), but only one
> continuous map 2 --> 1. The standard solution, IIRC, is to restrict the
> class of *-homomorphisms to those which "preserve the approximate
unit". ...
Another approach more closely resembles the "solution" that George
Janelidze and I have pointed out for the Boolean problem. To sketch it,
let me temporarily borrow the old Gelfand-Naimark terminology "normed ring"
for commutative C*-algebras with unit, and use "normed rng" for their
not-necessarily-unital counterparts.
As in the Boolean setting, then, "normed rngs" is, to within equivalence,
augmented "normed rings" (that is, the slice category "normed rings"|'C',
where C is the "coefficient ring" -- probably the real or the complex
field in most applications), whence as opposite to "normed rngs" one
immediately deduces the category of pointed compact Hausdorff spaces
(and *all* continuous base-point-preserving functions).
And, as there also, while the complement of the base point in such a
space may be locally compact, the passage to that complement is, again,
far from functorial -- unless one is willing either to restrict one's
attention, among maps of pointed compact spaces, to those that send
*only* the base point to the base point, or to extend one's attention to
certain only partially defined functions as maps of locally compact spaces.
Cheers, -- Fred
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-23 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-23 15:38 Fred E.J. Linton [this message]
2011-01-24 21:15 ` George Janelidze
2011-01-26 0:51 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
2011-01-26 17:19 ` F. William Lawvere
2011-01-27 2:41 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-22 18:47 Jeff Egger
2011-01-21 22:39 Fred E.J. Linton
2011-01-21 13:19 Andrej Bauer
2011-01-21 23:06 ` George Janelidze
2011-01-23 4:06 ` Yoshihiro Maruyama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1PhMsf-0000zH-8i@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=fejlinton@usa.net \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=jeffegger@yahoo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).