From: Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev@irit.fr>
To: Ronnie Brown <ronnie.profbrown@btinternet.com>
Cc: "categories@mta.ca" <categories@mta.ca>,
George Janelidze <janelg@telkomsa.net>
Subject: Re: Timelines for category theory: a response to comments
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:14:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1QgdS8-0006BD-E4@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1QgIJp-0006ro-Ed@mlist.mta.ca>
I think that the list of topics is very good, and the idea seems to me
very reasonnable.
And with all my respect to Eduardo ("No censorship to wikipedia !") I
don't think
that everything should be reduced to mere opinions and freedom of speech
- there is
also the notion of truth. Supposedly, the above mentioned freedom should
help
to find it, at least, in science.
Best regards
Sergei Soloviev
Ronnie Brown wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Many thanks for your comments, which show how our community sees the
> problem. The discussion is obviously not finished yet.
>
> Let us actually try to say what is the MAIN problem with this article.
> The main problem is the picture of category theory it draws! Many of you
> give courses in category theory at various levels - beautiful courses
> showing that category theory provides a new most advanced level of
> thinking in mathematics ("thinking categorically!"), and has made major
> contributions to the unity of mathematics. So, why don't you compare the
> plan of your own course with this article? Surely you do not begin your
> course with resolutions of modules and you do not end it with "extended
> TQFT", do you?
>
> On the other hand there is clearly a desire to have a good content and
> context for category theory on wikipedia, which is often the first port
> of call for students, and those potentially interested, and so there are
> calls for an improved Timeline for category theory. To take in the whole
> subject in one timeline, with references, would seem an enormous and
> controversial task.
>
> We therefore propose that the present article be replaced by a list of
> topics with links to articles on timelines of those topics. And then
> each "timeline" should be written by a chosen group of experts. Our
> first draft of topics would be:
>
> 1. General category theory, including motivation
> 2. Abelian categories and homological algebra
> 3. Categories and groupoids in homotopical algebra and algebraic topology
> 4. Topos theory
> 5. Monoidal, enriched, and higher-dimensional categories
> 6. Categorical algebra
> 7. Categorical topology
> 8. Categorical logic and foundation of mathematics
> 10. Categories in algebraic geometry
> 11. Categories in computer science
> 12. Categories in Physics
>
> There will be intersections of course, but we presume that is fine.
>
> As examples of timelines in other subjects, and their styles, see for
> example
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_timelines#Science
>
> particularly those on Physics.
>
> We look forward to reactions to this proposal.
>
> Ronnie Brown
>
> George Janelidze
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-10 17:03 Ronnie Brown
2011-07-11 15:58 ` jim stasheff
2011-07-11 18:11 ` Robert Dawson
2011-07-11 18:14 ` Sergei SOLOVIEV [this message]
2011-07-11 21:18 ` David Roberts
2011-07-12 16:13 ` Graham White
2011-07-13 0:33 ` Comments on a wikipedia article on a Timeline of Category theory peasthope
2011-07-13 7:43 ` Re: Timelines for category theory: a response to comments Patrik Eklund
2011-07-12 14:10 ` Jeremy Gibbons
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-11 17:34 André Joyal
2011-07-12 15:19 ` Michael Barr
2011-07-07 13:14 Comments on a wikipedia article on a Timeline of Category theory Ronnie Brown
2011-07-08 1:35 ` Joyal, André
2011-07-08 7:33 ` Andree Ehresmann
2011-07-08 11:53 ` Sergei SOLOVIEV
2011-07-08 12:57 ` Robert Dawson
2011-07-08 13:43 ` Valeria de Paiva
2011-07-09 2:52 ` Peter Selinger
2011-07-09 14:37 ` Toby Bartels
2011-07-09 19:48 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1QgdS8-0006BD-E4@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=soloviev@irit.fr \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=janelg@telkomsa.net \
--cc=ronnie.profbrown@btinternet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).