From: Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com>
To: "Eduardo J. Dubuc" <edubuc@dm.uba.ar>
Cc: Categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: science_publishers
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 07:11:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1QzAwA-0001Jv-71@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Qz5VK-0008UE-FM@mlist.mta.ca>
Another page with the same viewpoint:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/journals.html
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Eduardo J. Dubuc <edubuc@dm.uba.ar> wrote:
> Just thought some in the list may not be aware. Greetings e.d.
>
> ===============================================================
> Von: David Mumford [mailto:dbmumford@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. August 2011 18:11
> An: Caroline Series; Rob Kirby; Don McClure; Peter J Olver; Martin
> Groetschel; John Ball; Ingrid Daubechies; Jeremy Mumford;
> notices@math.wustl.edu; vicente.munoz@mat.ucm.es; Peter Michor
> Betreff: Fwd: Elsevier
>
>
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> My son sent me the link below to a very strong and very clear article in
> the Guardian about the huge fees charged by technical publishers for
> access to journals. It represents how I have felt for a long time, how
> the math community among others is being outrageously exploited. I feel
> it ought to galvanize scientists/mathematicians to react and would like
> to suggest reprinting it in e.g. the Notices of the AMS, the Newsletter
> of the EMS, the news email from the IMU, etc. The simple response for
> mathematicians is to cease submitting any papers to Elsevier or Springer
> journals. (Excuse me but I am sending this to a somewhat random sample
> of people that occurred to me and whose email address I had -- eg I
> don't have an address for Ewing or Friedlander.)
>
> yrs faithfully,
>
> David
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist
> =================================================================
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-31 18:48 science_publishers Eduardo J. Dubuc
2011-09-01 12:34 ` science_publishers Michael Barr
2011-09-01 18:55 ` science_publishers Steve Vickers
2011-09-02 20:26 ` science_publishers Ronnie Brown
2011-09-04 9:05 ` science_publishers George Janelidze
2011-09-01 14:11 ` Mike Stay [this message]
2011-09-01 18:24 ` science_publishers Vaughan Pratt
2011-09-02 19:46 ` science_publishers Jocelyn Ireson-Paine
[not found] ` <CAKQgqTbx-bm+pMHnG=iYDzGZVnZFoeTk+vGnC0ih=GUykUEVjw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-01 18:26 ` science_publishers Eduardo J. Dubuc
[not found] <313_1314877482_4E5F702A_313_50_1_E1Qz5VK-0008UE-FM@mlist.mta.ca>
2011-09-01 13:39 ` science_publishers Marta Bunge
2011-09-03 10:46 science_publishers Marta Bunge
2011-09-04 10:33 ` science_publishers Steve Vickers
2011-09-05 2:03 ` science_publishers Eduardo J. Dubuc
2011-09-04 15:55 science_publishers Marta Bunge
2011-09-05 19:03 science_publishers Bas Spitters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1QzAwA-0001Jv-71@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=metaweta@gmail.com \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=edubuc@dm.uba.ar \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).