categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marta Bunge <martabunge@hotmail.com>
To: <edubuc@dm.uba.ar>, <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: science_publishers
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 06:46:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Qzze8-00049O-Id@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)

Dear Eduardo,

I, too, consult ArXiv quite often, but I do so knowing that the articles in question are unrefereed preprints, as are lectures. This may be stimulating but, even as a way to establish priority, it is quite dubious. For instance, in ArXiv, one has the possibility of updating a posting, and so correct mistakes or add comments received privately. I do not know if the new postings replace the old one or coexists with it. The referee system has its drawbacks, but it is normally of use, not only to the  readers and institutions, but also to the author(s). Posting in ArXiv should always be followed by a publication in a refereed journal, but it not always is. As for journals in which the costs of publishing are nil, we categorists have the fortune of having a reputable journal such as TAC where to send our papers. In this I totally agree with Mike Barr. Cahiers is, to a lesser extent perhaps, another such instance, and it can now be accessed electronically (Numdam). There are also refereed proceedings of festshrifts or conferences which may not be rated as high as some journals, but which are part of our community life and, in some sense, a duty  that we have towards our respected colleagues. As for high cost journals, I once signed a pledge not to publish in any Elsevier journal, and advertised my action in categories. Several people in this forum thought this  was stupid, but others praised me. It is a matter of conscience. I do not have a solution, but asking libraries to stop subscribing to prestigious journals is in my view utopic. I already suggested requesting funding agencies and university policy makers to give higher ratings to journals which  deserve to be so considered, particularly when the author gives reasons for choosing such journals rather than the high end ones. Finally, I (and  so, anyone) can access ArXiv postings without any problem- it is not hard to locate what one wants to read in them. An excellent source of information, but it could never replace refereed journals. 

Regards, 

Marta



> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:26:19 -0300
> From: edubuc@dm.uba.ar
> To: categories@mta.ca
> Subject: categories: Re: science_publishers
> 
> Marta Bunge writes:
> 
> "it is (still) a measure of success by grant giving agencies to have
> published in such journals and, in turn, a measure for promotion
> considerations."
> 
> Michael Barr writes:
> 
> "Finally convince granting agencies to find better ways of measuring
> impact."
> 
> This is just the real problem. Michael, it is not "finally", but "first
> of all".
> 
> Once this is changed, high ranked journals will be in trouble.
> 
> But, I am afraid it will be impossible. There is an arrow in evolution,
> and this arrow points into the fact that journals rankings and impact
> factors are going to be more and more determinant for the academic
> career of 99% of the mathematicians (expet for the future few
> Grothendiecks Serres Cartans and the like).
> 
> Something on the other hand can be attempted:
> 
> 1) Make a strong campaign so to popularize and convince all authors to
> send their papers to the arXiv.
> 
> 2) Convince all libraries to stop all subscriptions to journals, and
> install electronic easy to use catalogs of all arXiv papers, have them
> in stock, and furnish the structure for the immediate printing of
> requested papers.
> 
> Personally, most of the reading I am doing recently are from arXiv
> papers, not from published papers.
> 
> On the other hand, the only papers which are considered for grant
> soliciting, promotions (and even worst, here if you stop publishing you
> loose your job, which is at stake every 7 years) are published papers,
> the more high ranked (impact factor) the journal the better.
> 
> So, to read the work of others, and make your own work known, you will
> use the arXiv, to get ahead in your academic career you will publish
> (papers which nobody will need to buy).
> 
> e.d.
> 
  		 	   		  

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2011-09-03 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-03 10:46 Marta Bunge [this message]
2011-09-04 10:33 ` science_publishers Steve Vickers
2011-09-05  2:03 ` science_publishers Eduardo J. Dubuc
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-05 19:03 science_publishers Bas Spitters
2011-09-04 15:55 science_publishers Marta Bunge
     [not found] <313_1314877482_4E5F702A_313_50_1_E1Qz5VK-0008UE-FM@mlist.mta.ca>
2011-09-01 13:39 ` science_publishers Marta Bunge
2011-08-31 18:48 science_publishers Eduardo J. Dubuc
2011-09-01 12:34 ` science_publishers Michael Barr
2011-09-01 18:55   ` science_publishers Steve Vickers
2011-09-02 20:26     ` science_publishers Ronnie Brown
2011-09-04  9:05       ` science_publishers George Janelidze
2011-09-01 14:11 ` science_publishers Mike Stay
2011-09-01 18:24   ` science_publishers Vaughan Pratt
2011-09-02 19:46     ` science_publishers Jocelyn Ireson-Paine
     [not found] ` <CAKQgqTbx-bm+pMHnG=iYDzGZVnZFoeTk+vGnC0ih=GUykUEVjw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-01 18:26   ` science_publishers Eduardo J. Dubuc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Qzze8-00049O-Id@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=martabunge@hotmail.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=edubuc@dm.uba.ar \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).