From: Urs Schreiber <urs.schreiber@googlemail.com>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Cc: Dmitry Roytenberg <starrgazerr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Simplicial versus (cubical with connections)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:06:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1R4XqY-0002M5-8j@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1R4GgT-0007ej-Hq@mlist.mta.ca>
> So my question is, is it known whether the category of cubical
> sets, with or without connections, admits an excellent model
> structure?
The only model structure on cubical sets that I am aware of is that
given by Jardine:
http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/model+structure+on+cubical+sets
Its cofibrations are the monos, but the other axioms of "excellent"
(HTT A.3.2.16) seem problematic. But I haven't really thought about
it.
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-15 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <33D5C4F9-416F-47E2-9CB3-C0109F977475@gmail.com>
2011-09-14 10:04 ` Ronnie Brown
[not found] ` <E1R4GgT-0007ej-Hq@mlist.mta.ca>
2011-09-15 19:06 ` Urs Schreiber [this message]
2011-09-16 13:24 ` Fernando Muro
2011-10-18 13:27 ` Urs Schreiber
2011-10-19 8:35 ` Marco Grandis
2011-10-19 17:09 ` Vaughan Pratt
2011-10-20 10:39 ` Ronnie Brown
2011-10-29 1:08 Simplicial versus (cubical) " F William Lawvere
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-22 13:07 Simplicial versus (cubical " Todd Trimble
2011-10-26 21:27 ` F. William Lawvere
[not found] <E1RGrPh-0003WW-KS@mlist.mta.ca>
2011-10-20 22:08 ` Ross Street
2011-09-12 0:30 Simplicial groups are Kan Michael Barr
2011-09-12 9:35 ` Ronnie Brown
2011-09-13 15:12 ` Simplicial versus (cubical with connections) Marco Grandis
[not found] ` <BDF51495-03DB-4725-8372-094AD1608A11@dima.unige.it>
2011-09-13 16:58 ` Ronnie Brown
2011-09-14 7:08 ` Jonathan CHICHE 齊正航
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1R4XqY-0002M5-8j@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=urs.schreiber@googlemail.com \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=starrgazerr@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).