From: Steve Lack <steve.lack@mq.edu.au>
To: David Leduc <david.leduc6@googlemail.com>
Cc: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Dualizing comma categories
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:29:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1RKrIy-0002OE-7C@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1RKVbv-0005yH-G5@mlist.mta.ca>
Dear David,
As usual, constructing colimits in Cat (and other concrete categories or 2-categories)
is more difficult than constructing limits.
As you suspected, a cocomma object over the initial object is just a coproduct. This is
completely general, not just true in Cat. Seen as a general 2-categorical fact, it becomes
the same fact that you mentioned: a comma object over a terminal object is just a product.
I won't try to describe the general cocomma object, but another special case of a cocomma
object is the *collage* of an arrow f:A-->B. This is the universal diagram containing arrows
i:A->C and j:B->C and a 2-cell jf->i. It can be seen as a cocomma object of f and the identity
1_A. This special case is easy to describe in Cat. The object-set of C is the disjoint
union of the object-sets of A and of B. A morphism in C between objects of A is a
morphism in A; a morphism in C between objects of B is a morphism of B. There is
a morphism fa->a for each a in A, and these are the only morphisms from objects
of B to objects of A; there are no morphisms from objects of A to objects of B.
(Thus the morphisms can be described by the 2x2 matrix with entries A, f, 0, B; this can
be made precise if you think of the underlying span of a category as a matrix.)
Steve Lack.
On 30/10/2011, at 11:34 PM, David Leduc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A comma category is a comma object in the 2-category Cat of categories
> and functors. And a comma object is defined by a universal property.
> Now, one can dualize the notion of comma object by turning around the
> 1-cells and/or 2-cells in its definition. My question is: when we
> instantiate those dualized definitions to Cat, what do we obtain? In
> other words, what is a "co-comma category"?
>
> For example, since the product of two categories is a special case of
> comma category, I would expect that the coproduct of two categories is
> a special case of "co-comma category".
>
> Thanks!
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-30 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-30 12:34 David Leduc
2011-10-30 22:29 ` Steve Lack [this message]
2011-11-01 4:05 ` Michael Shulman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1RKrIy-0002OE-7C@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=steve.lack@mq.edu.au \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=david.leduc6@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).