From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/7045
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Prof. Peter Johnstone"
Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories
Subject: Re: The boringness of the dual of exponential
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:29:06 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID:
References:
Reply-To: "Prof. Peter Johnstone"
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320954782 27062 80.91.229.12 (10 Nov 2011 19:53:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: David Leduc , categories@mta.ca
To: Paul Taylor
Original-X-From: majordomo@mlist.mta.ca Thu Nov 10 20:52:58 2011
Return-path:
Envelope-to: gsmc-categories@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from smtpx.mta.ca ([138.73.1.4])
by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from )
id 1ROag9-0003st-5o
for gsmc-categories@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:52:53 +0100
Original-Received: from mlist.mta.ca ([138.73.1.63]:55014)
by smtpx.mta.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from )
id 1ROae0-0007Fe-Vl; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:50:40 -0400
Original-Received: from majordomo by mlist.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from )
id 1ROadz-0006jj-9H
for categories-list@mlist.mta.ca; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:50:39 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:7045
Archived-At:
One point that no-one has mentioned yet is that you can't have
exponentiation and its dual in the same category, unless it is a
preorder. If exponentiation exists, then the initial object 0 is
strict, and so 0 x 0 = 0 (read all equality signs as isomorphisms).
But if A + (-) has a left adjoint then it distributes over product,
so
A = A + 0 = A + (0 x 0) = (A + 0) x (A + 0) = A x A
which implies that any two maps into A (with the same domain)
are equal. Of course, bi-Heyting algebras (posets P such that
both P and P^op are cartesian closed) are of some interest, as has
already been mentioned; but if you want to work in non-preordered
categories then you have to choose one or the other.
Peter Johnstone
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Paul Taylor wrote:
> When David originally posted his question, I thought it was rather
> a silly one and that it was quite rightly dismissed by various
> people. On the other hand, he now says
>
>> However, I am not yet satisfied. Let me precise my thoughts. In the
>> textbooks and lecture notes on category category that I have read,
>> there are always product and coproduct, pullback and pushout,
>> equalizer and coequalizer, monomorphism and epimorphism, and so on.
>> However exponential is always left alone. That is why I assumed it is
>> boring. If it is not boring, why is it never mentioned in textbooks
>> and lecture notes on category theory?
>
> In other words, these things are "idioms" or "naturally occurring
> things" in mathematics, but there is a gap in the obvious symmetries.
>
> Looking for gaps in symmetries is a good thing to do. For example
> Dirac (whose biography by Graham Farmelo I have just started reading)
> predicted the positron this way.
>
> Actually, if we're looking at the categorical structure of the category
> of sets, it isn't very symmetrical at all. The second edition of
> Paul Cohn's "Universal Algebra" was evidently influenced by Mac Lane's
> famous textbook, but illustrates how categorists had way overemphasised
> duality.
>
> For example the terminal object yields the classical notion of element
> or point, whereas the initial object is strict and boring.
>
> Products and coproducts of sets are very different.
>
> I explored this kind of thing in my book. For example, the section
> on coproducts shows how different they are in sets/spaces and algebras.
>
> So David's question becomes a good one that deserves an answer if
> we read it as one about the phenomenology of mathematics rather than
> its technicalities.
>
> Paul Taylor
>
> PS There is a boring technical answer that I don't think anyone has
> mentioned, namely copowers, especially of modules.
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]