categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Houston <robin.houston@gmail.com>
To: Szlachanyi Kornel <szlach@rmki.kfki.hu>
Cc: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: skew-monoidal category?
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:23:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1RWx5T-0000su-7I@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1RWTOb-0003Gb-FR@mlist.mta.ca>

I don’t know the full history of this idea; I came across it in the
work of
Marco Grandis on directed homotopy, such as
http://www.dima.unige.it/~grandis/LCat.pdf

Grandis considers a generalisation of bicategories, rather than monoidal
categories, but of course the monoidal version is the special case of a
bicategory with a single object.

Actually Grandis has the maps you call eta and eps going the other way, so
perhaps the precise notion you’re describing is more closely related to
Burroni’s 1971 notion of ‘pseudocategory’.

Anyway I expect some of the more knowledgeable members of this list will be
able to give you a better answer!

All the best,
Robin

2011/12/2 Szlachanyi Kornel <szlach@rmki.kfki.hu>

> Dear All,
>
> I wonder if the following notion has already a name and disscussed
> somewhere: It is like a monoidal category but the associator and units
> are not invertible. (Lax monoidal categories share this property but they
> seem to treat the units differently.) It has left and right versions, the
> "right-monoidal" category consists of
>
> a category C,
> a functor C x C --> C, <M,N> |--> M*N,
> an object R
> and natural transformations
>   gamma_L,M,N: L*(M*N) --> (L*M)*N
>   eta_M: M --> R*M
>   eps_M: M*R -->M
>
> satisfying 5 axioms (1 pentagon, 3 triangles and eps_R o eta_R = R) that
> are obtained from the usual monoidal category axioms by expressing
> everything in terms of the associator, the right unit (eps), and the
> inverse left unit (eta) never using their inverses.
>
> I find this structure interesting because of the following:
>
> Thm: Let R be a ring. Closed right-monoidal structures on the category M_R
> of right R-modules are (up to approp. isomorphisms on both sides) precisely
> the right R-bialgebroids.
>
> (The ordinary monoidal structure remains hidden in the special nature of
> M_R.)
>
> I would thank for any suggestion.
>
> Kornel Szlachanyi
>
>

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-02 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-02 10:43 Szlachanyi Kornel
2011-12-02 14:23 ` Robin Houston [this message]
2011-12-06  9:30 ` Marco Grandis
2011-12-07 17:30 Szlachanyi Kornel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1RWx5T-0000su-7I@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=robin.houston@gmail.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=szlach@rmki.kfki.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).