From: "Eduardo J. Dubuc" <edubuc@dm.uba.ar>
To: Michael Barr <barr@math.mcgill.ca>
Cc: Categories list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Derived cotriples
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:41:08 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1SXK30-0003e4-88@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1SWrfE-0006bv-Tb@mlist.mta.ca>
On 21/05/12 18:23, Michael Barr wrote:
> Suppose (G,\epsilon,\delta) is a cotriple on a complete category. Let G^2
> ===> G ---> G' be a coequalizer. Then we can find canonical (perhaps
> unique) \epsilon': G' ---> Id and \delta': G' ---> G'^2 such that
> (G',\epsilon',\delta') is a new cotriple on the category and such that G
> ---> G' is a map of cotriples. It seems reasonable to call this the
> derived cotriple. This process can be repeated, apparently forever, using
> colimits at limit ordinals. If it ever stablizes, the resultant cotriple
> will be idempotent and vice versa. Does any know whether this construction
> has been studied before?
>
> Michael
>
Hi, the following is related (or the same ?):
In my thesis (SLN 145, page 135) I consider the dual case of
monads=triples in the enriched V-category case.
Considering triple T in A (with the smallness (*) condition of being the
codensity triple determined by a set of objects in A).
I construct a chain of categories
B=A_oo ---> ... ---> A_a ---> .... ---> A_b ---> ... A_1 ---> A_0=A
where A_1 is the category of algebras for the triple T in A
A_(a+1) ---> A_a , A_(a+1) is algebras for a triple in A_a
for a limit ordinal a, A_a is a limit of the preceeding chain of rigth
adjoints.
B is the limit of the large tower over all the ordinals, which is shown
to exists (see (*)).
We have for all "a" a rigth adjoint functor A_a ---> A determining a
triple T_a in A and also a rigth adjoint functor B ---> A, which is
full and faithful and so the corresponding cotriple in B is the
identity, and the corresponding triple T_oo in A is idempotent. There
are maps of triples:
T_oo ---> ... ---> T_a ---> ... ---> T_b ---> ... ---> T_1 = T
(with T_oo idempotent).
(*) The smallness condition is not needed to develop this construction,
but it is needed to prove that the process stabilizes, that is, that the
cotriple in B is the identity.
Eduardo Dubuc
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 21:23 Michael Barr
2012-05-22 16:34 ` Prof. Peter Johnstone
2012-05-22 21:37 ` Ross Street
2012-05-22 17:41 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc [this message]
2012-05-22 22:35 ` Donovan Van Osdol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1SXK30-0003e4-88@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=edubuc@dm.uba.ar \
--cc=barr@math.mcgill.ca \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).