From: Mark Weber <mark.weber.math@googlemail.com>
To: "info@christophertownsend.org" <info@christophertownsend.org>
Cc: "categories@mta.ca" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Yoneda Lemma when there is a monad
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:13:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1T4C4p-0007e7-HR@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1T3nON-0002W0-9T@mlist.mta.ca>
Dear Christopher
Your lemma is a combination of 2 results in the literature. The first is Proposition(13) of
1. R. Street and B. Walters, Yoneda structures on 2-categories,
Journal of Algebra 50:350-379, 1978
which says that for a functor J:B-->C between locally small categories, the functor
PB(C(J,1),1):PB-->PC
corresponds to taking right kan extension along J -- here PB=[B^op,Set], C(J,1):C-->PB sends (b,c) to the hom set C(Jb,c). Your lemma is the case J=K (the comparison functor), and one uses the result that K is dense, due to Fred Linton
2. F. Linton, Relative functorial semantics: adjointness results,
LNM 99:384-418, 1969
to simplify the right kan extension to the F(A,a) of your lemma. Often there are nice subcategories of C_T which are also dense in C^T, and this would give other variants of your lemma. For more on this kind of situation see
http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.3064
With best regards,
Mark Weber
On 21/08/2012, at 7:34 PM, info@christophertownsend.org wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone have any references for the following generalisation of
> the Yoneda lemma:
>
> Lemma: If (T,i,m) is a monad on a locally small category C then for
> any functor F:(C_T)^op->Set, contravariant from the Kleisli category
> to Set and for any T algebra (A,a)
>
> Nat[C^T(K_,(A,a)),F]=F(A,a)
>
> where K is the usual comparison functor from the Kleisli category,
> C_T, to the category of algebras of T, C^T. F(A,a) means the subset
> of F(A) consisting of elements x such that F(m_A)x=F(Ta)x. (And Nat[_]
> means the set of natural transformations.) //
>
> The usual Yoneda lemma is recovered by taking the trivial monad. The
> Lemma gives a generalised Yoneda embedding: C^T embeds in
> [(C_T)^op,Set]; i.e. any category of algebras embeds in the presheaf
> category of the Kleisli category. I wasn't aware of this quite trivial
> result and was hoping for some guidance as to where it is covered
> already in the literature?
>
> Thanks, Christopher
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 9:34 info
2012-08-21 12:25 ` Zhen Lin Low
2012-08-21 18:08 ` Tom Leinster
2012-08-21 21:26 ` Ross Street
2012-08-21 21:49 ` Ross Street
2012-08-22 0:13 ` Mark Weber [this message]
2012-08-22 14:29 ` Vaughan Pratt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1T4C4p-0007e7-HR@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=mark.weber.math@googlemail.com \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=info@christophertownsend.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).