categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fred E.J. Linton" <fejlinton@usa.net>
To: <peasthope@shaw.ca>, <categories@mta.ca>
Cc: <peasthope@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: Terminology; categorical versus categorial.
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:35:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1TA4Cs-0008Vk-R7@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)

Peter Easthope (peasthope@shaw.ca) proposed:

> According to online dictionaries, categorical and categorial can be 
> synonyms.  Almost everyone seems to prefer categorical whereas 
> categorial comes from the simple rule of replacing the last vowel of 
> the noun with "ial".
> 
> So, is the preference for categorical just an inheritance from early 
> authors?  Is there a stronger reason to use it?  Is the explanation 
> in the archive?

It's a lovely "simple rule", Peter, but where does it apply? Certainly not to
Allegory, Anthropology, Biology, Botany, Catastrophe, Economy, Geology,
History, 
..., Numerology, Ornithology, Philosophy, Psychology, ..., Topology, ...,
Zoology. 

"Arterial", from artery, and "peripheral", from periphery, look more like
exceptions 
to, rather than instances of, any rule. Or am I overlooking masses of other
evidence?

Anyway, has anyone started speaking yet (in English) of Kant's "categorial
imperative"?

Cheers, -- Fred 



[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2012-09-07 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-07 17:35 Fred E.J. Linton [this message]
2012-09-07 23:37 ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-08  6:17 Fred E.J. Linton
2012-09-08  2:08 Fred E.J. Linton
2012-09-06 18:39 peasthope
2012-09-07 15:12 ` Michael Barr
2012-09-07 15:39 ` Graham White
2012-09-07 16:18 ` Robert Seely
2012-09-07 17:58 ` Robert Dawson
2012-09-07 19:57 ` Peter Selinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1TA4Cs-0008Vk-R7@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=fejlinton@usa.net \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=peasthope@shaw.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).