From: Colin McLarty <colin.mclarty@case.edu>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: Deligne on Grothendieck
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:20:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1U1GK3-00080B-80@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOzx82p8A2L+=4X8wOnLggjoYDW5fqHwy77Fry2EcuBu3p770w@mail.gmail.com>
Eduardo,
I guess you meant the comments of Serre quoted along with Mumford,
Tate, and Arkani-Hamed in the note by Siobhan Roberts. (The note is
at simonsfoundation.org/science_lives_bio/pierre-deligne/)
Colin
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Colin McLarty <colin.mclarty@case.edu> wrote:
> Where is the link to Serre's comments?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Eduardo J. Dubuc <edubuc@dm.uba.ar> wrote:
>> On 29/01/13 09:08, Joyal, Andr? wrote:
>>>
>>> An interview of Deligne by MacPherson:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://simonsfoundation.org/category/features/science-lives/
>>>
>>
>> I have not see the interview of Deligne by MacPherson in the link above,
>> but I read in that link the comments of Serre on the mathematics of
>> Deligne as opposed to the mathematics of Grothendieck, and his
>> conclusion that Deligne is best. It is interesting to notice that when
>> describing the characteristics and virtues of Deligne's mathematics he
>> is just describing the characteristics and virtues of his own
>> mathematics. Clearly Deligne's and Serre's mathematics are similar and
>> different to Grothendieck's. In putting Deligne's mathematics at the
>> top, Serre is just putting his own mathematics at the top.
>>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 12:08 Joyal, André
2013-01-30 21:00 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
2013-02-01 4:05 ` David Espinosa
[not found] ` <CAOzx82p8A2L+=4X8wOnLggjoYDW5fqHwy77Fry2EcuBu3p770w@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-31 22:20 ` Colin McLarty [this message]
[not found] <510989E8.9070307@dm.uba.ar>
2013-02-01 1:53 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1U1GK3-00080B-80@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=colin.mclarty@case.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).