From: "Noson S. Yanofsky" <noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu>
To: "'Categories list'" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Higher Lawvere theories?
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 23:08:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1V5yO1-00076I-Tm@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
Hi,
In a paper:
Coherence, Homotopy and 2-Theories
K-Theory 23: Pgs 203 - 235. (2001).
I worked out much of 2-Theories and their relationship with coherence
theory.
Abstract:
2-Theories are a canonical way of describing categories with extra
structure. 2-theory-morphisms are used when discussing how one structure can
be replaced with another structure. This is central to categorical coherence
theory. We place a Quillen model category structure on the category of
2-theories and 2-theory-morphisms where the weak equivalences are
biequivalences of 2-theories. A biequivalence of 2-theories (Morita
equivalence) induces and is induced by a biequivalence of 2-categories of
algebras. This model category structure allows one to talk of the homotopy
of 2-theories and discuss the universal properties of coherence.
There is also a version on the arXiv:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/math.CT/0007033
All the best,
Noson Yanofsky
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Stay [mailto:metaweta@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:35 PM
To: categories
Subject: categories: Higher Lawvere theories?
Has anyone worked out the details of "higher Lawvere theories" so that one
can say "the free bicategory on this object, these morphisms, these
2-morphisms, modulo these equations of 2-morphisms"?
--
Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mike
http://reperiendi.wordpress.com
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-04 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-04 3:08 Noson S. Yanofsky [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-02 16:35 Mike Stay
2013-08-03 13:47 ` Aleks Kissinger
[not found] ` <CAC9Y7nn0Zp1eo+KAQ14tGTAbpF60KULzSymv2jGEPNGe7VvdVw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-04 14:52 ` Thomas Fiore
2013-08-05 16:08 ` Mike Stay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1V5yO1-00076I-Tm@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).