categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhen Lin Low <zll22@cam.ac.uk>
To: Thomas Streicher <streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Cc: Andrej Bauer <andrej.bauer@andrej.com>,
	categories list <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: A category internal to itself
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:20:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1VHvpk-0000tE-1p@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130906080410.GA19753@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>

On 6 September 2013 09:04, Thomas Streicher
<streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>> To begin, consider a category C with finite limits. Suppose C has an
>> internal category U such that the externalisation of U as a C-indexed
>> category (or category fibred over C) is equivalent to the
>> self-indexing of C. Since U is locally small as a C-indexed category,
>> the self-indexing of C has the same property, so we deduce that C is
>> locally cartesian closed.
>
> Excellent observation! Thus C is a model for Martin-Loef type theory
> with Type : Type (as interpreted by U). It is known since Girard's
> paradox from 1970 that this type theory is inconsistent, i.e. that
> every type is inhabited. Thus, in particular, all identity types are
> inhabited which renders C trivial.

I am aware of Girard's paradox but I was under the (mistaken?)
impression that slightly more than the structure of a locally
cartesian closed category was needed, e.g. a Prop type.

> For a more categorical account of the inconcistency of type theory
> with Type:Type see
>
> A note on Russell's paradox in locally cartesian
> closed categories
> Andrew M. Pitts & Paul Taylor
> Studia Logica 48 (3):377 - 387 (1989)
>
> which is much simpler than Girard's original proof.

Alex Simpson pointed out this paper to me yesterday. Thank you (to
both of you!) for bringing it to my attention.

> But I don't understand some of your subsequent arguments.
>
>> We have a universal fibration el U -> ob U (by restricting the
>> fibration mor U -> ob U x ob U), so it follows that every object X
>> admits a monomorphism X -> el U.
>
> why? and if so what is the point? in a topos for every object X there
> is a mono 0 -> X

Let X be an object. Then it has a name, say u : 1 -> ob U, and by
pulling back u along the universal fibration el U -> ob U, we get a
monomorphism X -> el U. This allows us to run Russell's argument in
the internal logic, cf [McLarty, _Failure of cartesian closedness in
NF_].

--
Zhen Lin


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-06  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-04  9:23 Andrej Bauer
2013-09-04 20:04 ` Eduardo J. Dubuc
2013-09-04 22:11 ` Colin McLarty
2013-09-05  8:27 ` Edmund Robinson
2013-09-05 11:30 ` Zhen Lin Low
2013-09-05 13:44   ` Alex Simpson
     [not found]   ` <20130906080410.GA19753@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de>
2013-09-06  8:20     ` Zhen Lin Low [this message]
     [not found]   ` <CAB0nkh3zxgAV4tU1jr5ZTWw0exgQEcjGVSyRDqy=T0XE6DaG6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-06 12:33     ` Thomas Streicher
     [not found] ` <CAOzx82rUa8KRkngePON8Gh1KttzZ1-3AKNpP5DQNY7RfEj1VTQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-05 11:46   ` Colin McLarty
     [not found] ` <CAOOzEh-04Cq7L_k7v6qxWTYRhkWZw862kmPzLaSNZUgr8Zvzdw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-06  9:48   ` Andrej Bauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1VHvpk-0000tE-1p@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=zll22@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=andrej.bauer@andrej.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=streicher@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).