categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Evaluation of source code, category theoretically?
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 13:48:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1VzcC1-0007ys-6q@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKQgqTYam=YUD5uvLxPu3HkMe=gSirKgGqKnoq0Rx_mkYdK7jw@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks, all for your responses so far; many of you have asked what my
motivation was for the question.  I'm trying to understand pi
calculus.  I've got a bicategorical model of a fragment of pi calculus
where prefixing is composition, but in order to prevent reduction
under a prefix, the remainder of the term needs to be suspended; one
way to do that is to treat it as "source code" and evaluate it in an
environment with bindings, thus my question.

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's the right way to think about evaluation in category theory?
> I'm guessing it will look kind of like this: the category will be
> symmetric monoidal closed and equipped with an object S whose points
> are "source code", together with a collection of interpreter
> epimorphisms
>     run_{X, Y}: S -> [X, Y]
> and some notion of composition in S that works well with composition
> of morphisms.
>
> What are the right keywords for doing a literature search on this?
> --
> Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com
> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mike
> http://reperiendi.wordpress.com

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


       reply	other threads:[~2014-01-04 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAKQgqTYam=YUD5uvLxPu3HkMe=gSirKgGqKnoq0Rx_mkYdK7jw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-04 20:48 ` Mike Stay [this message]
2014-01-03 17:46 Greg Meredith
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-02 18:05 Mike Stay
2014-01-23 23:30 ` dusko pavlovic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1VzcC1-0007ys-6q@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=metaweta@gmail.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).