categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Johnstone <ptj@dpmms.cam.ac.uk>
To: David Roberts <david.roberts@adelaide.edu.au>
Cc: "categories@mta.ca list" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: NNOs in different toposes "the same"?
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:37:13 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Xocl0-00060A-Qg@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1XnyDU-0002hm-Ai@mlist.mta.ca>

As Claudio has said, inverse image functors always preserve the NNO,
but David's question was: when does the direct image f_* preserve
the NNO? A sufficient condition for this which is weaker than being
local is that f should be connected, i.e. that f^* should be full
and faithful, since then the unit map N -> f_*f^*N is an isomorphism.
But this is certainly not necessary: for example, the inclusion from
sheaves to presheaves on any locally connected internal site in a
topos preserves N (see C3.3.10 in the Elephant). I don't know any
necessary and sufficient condition (other than the condition that
f_* preserves N!); if you restrict to countably cocomplete toposes
(where N is always a countable copower of 1), then f_* preserves N
iff it preserves all countable coproducts, iff f^* is full and faithful
on morphisms with codomain N. But it's not clear to me what significance
this latter condition has.

Peter Johnstone

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, David Roberts wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> If have a geometric morphism f: E -> F, what's the/a sensible way to
> say that the natural number objects of E and F are 'the same'? If f is
> local, then f_* preserves colimits, and so both f^* and f_* respect
> natural numbers objects up to iso. But this is a little too strong,
> perhaps, since we only need f_* to respect finite limits to use the
> characterisation of |N by Freyd to show preservation. What other
> conditions could I impose, other than simply that f_* preserves the
> NNO?
>
> Secondly, what if E is the externalisation of an internal topos in F?
> For instance, F = Set and E the externalisation of a small topos, not
> necessarily an internal universe (in fact I don't want this to be the
> case!). Then if I can say what it means for the NNO in E to be 'the
> same as' that in F, I can say that the internal topos has the same NNO
> as the ambient category.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>

[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-12 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-10  1:42 David Roberts
2014-11-11 13:01 ` Claudio Hermida
2014-11-11 22:14   ` David Roberts
2014-11-12 11:37 ` Peter Johnstone [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Xocl0-00060A-Qg@mlist.mta.ca \
    --to=ptj@dpmms.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    --cc=david.roberts@adelaide.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).