From: Nikita Danilov <danilov@gmail.com>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: A construction for polynomials.
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:32:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1anEyD-0006Bk-KB@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
Dear list,
I am looking for a reference to the following construction.
In the simplest case, consider the forgetful functor P:Ring->Set, from the
category of commutative rings with a unit. Then the set of natural endomorphisms
Nat(P, P) can be identified with the set of polynomials of one variable with
integer coefficients Z[X]. This can be easily seen by the chain of
isomorphisms
Nat(P, P) = Nat(Ring(Z[X], -), P) = Z[X],
where the first isomorphism is due to Z[X] being a free ring with one
generator
and the second is by Yoneda's lemma. Alternatively, just observe that
polynomial
functions are precisely ones commuting with every ring homomorphism.
In general, let P:C->B be a functor from an arbitrary C to a cartesian
closed
B. Select an object R in C and let R/P:R/C->B be the "obvious" forgetful
functor
from the co-slice category. For an object S of B define
R[S] = Nat(R/P * hom(S, -), R/P),
where hom is the internal hom functor of B and * is functor composition in
the
diagrammatical order. For C = Ring, B = Set this gives the usual ring of
polynomials with coefficients in R and variables from S.
This construction extends to a functor C x B -> Set and has some nice
properties
of the usual polynomials: polynomials of "one variable" (i.e., when S = 1)
can
be composed, to each r:1->R and x:1->S corresponds a polynomial (provided P
maps
1 to 1).
Has this or dual (where C/R is used instead of R/C) construction been
studied?
Maybe in enriched contexts?
Thank you,
Nikita.
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2016-04-04 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-04 13:32 Nikita Danilov [this message]
2016-04-06 7:04 ` Anders Kock
2016-04-05 3:59 Fred E.J. Linton
2016-04-05 16:58 Rory Lucyshyn-Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1anEyD-0006Bk-KB@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=danilov@gmail.com \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).