From: "Fred E.J. Linton" <fejlinton@usa.net>
To: David Yetter <dyetter@ksu.edu>, "categories@mta.ca" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Half cartesian duoical categories
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:52:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1btI5u-0001Vt-7T@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
Fix a duoidal category as in David's scenario, below. Write 1 and I
for the monoidal unit objects for x and #, respectively. If indeed
> (A x B) # (C x D) ------> (A # B) x (C # D)
is to hold, then x and # must essentially coincide. Here's why:
1) I = I # I = (1 x I) # (1 x I) = (1 # I) x (1 # I) = 1 x 1 = 1 ; whence
2) A # C = (A x 1) # (C x 1) = (A # 1) x (C # 1) = A x C .
Or perhaps David meant to posit the more usual middle 4 interchange law
: (A x B) # (C x D) ------> (A # C) x (B # D) ?
Wouldn't surprise me. But there I'm no help, sorry. Cheers, -- Fred
---
------ Original Message ------
Received: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 02:50:44 PM EDT
From: David Yetter <dyetter@ksu.edu>
To: "categories@mta.ca" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: categories: Half cartesian duoical categories
> Is there already a name in the literature for the special instance of
duoidal category in which one of the monoidal structures is cartesian? In
particular the instance in which if # denotes the non-cartesian monoidal
structure and x the cartesian, the lax middle-four interchange transformation
has components
>
>
> (A x B) # (C x D) ------> (A # B) x (C # D) ?
>
>
> It has come up in my current student's dissertation work. An existing name
and citations to papers using this specific type of duoidal category would be
much appreciated.
>
>
> Best Thoughts,
>
> David Yetter
>
> Professor of Mathematics
>
> Kansas State University
>
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-07 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-07 19:52 Fred E.J. Linton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-06 19:48 David Yetter
2016-10-08 2:57 ` Ross Street
2016-10-08 11:31 ` Robert Pare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1btI5u-0001Vt-7T@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=fejlinton@usa.net \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=dyetter@ksu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).