From: Joost Vercruysse <jvercruy@ulb.ac.be>
To: Peter Bubenik <peter.bubenik@gmail.com>
Cc: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: partial adjoints
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:44:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1c75Ei-0006sI-0r@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1c5ZOU-0004U0-MT@mlist.mta.ca>
Dear Peter,
A few years ago, I have been looking to a generalization of adjoint functors, where there is not necessarily a unit or counit.
I am not sure if this is relevant for what you want to do, but maybe the technique can be useful.
Here is a short description:
If F:C\to D and G:D\to C are two functors, and suppose that everything is k-linear (where k is a commutative ring, but this linearity is not essential),
then you can construct a Morita context as follows
(Nat(F,F), Nat(G,G)^op, Nat(1,FG), Nat(GF,1), f , g)
Here Nat(F,F) and Nat(G,G)^op are monoids (k-algebras) for the usual composition of natural tranformations, and Nat(1,FG) and Nat(GF,1) are bimodules between these, e.g. for a\in Nat(1,FG), b\in Nat(F,F) and c\in Nat(G,G)^op, we have b.a.c= Fc\circ bG\circ a=bG\circ Fc\circ a.
The Morita maps are given by f(a\otimes b) = Fb\circ aF\in Nat(F,F) with a\in Nat(1,FG) and b\in Nat(GF,1), and a similar formula for g.
Now you can observe that F and G are adjoint if and only if the above Morita context contains invertible elements that make it a strict context; explictly this means that there exist elements u\in Nat(1,FG) and e\in Nat(GF,1) such that f(u\otimes e)=1_F and g(e\otimes u)=1_G. Of course, u and e are exactly the unit and counit of the adjunction.
The generalized notions of adjoint functors I mentioned above, were obtained by considering arbitrary surjective Morita maps, which means that you have not a single unit and counit, but finite sets of “units” and “counits” which satisfy still an appropriate condition (for this to work you need indeed to work in the k-linear, or at least an enriched, setting). It is temptative to call “quasi-adjoint” functors since it is related to quasi-Frobenius algebras.
Another variation is to consider the case where f(u\otimes e) is not the identity natural transformation on F, but it is a natural transformation that is the identity map on FX for only a (finite) number of objects X in C.
This is related to “coFrobenius coalgebras”.
For details, you can have a look at
M. Iovanov and J. Vercruysse, Cofrobenius Corings and adjoint Functors, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 212 (9), 2027-2058 (2008).
Best wishes,
Joost.
> On 12 nov. 2016, at 00:26, Peter Bubenik <peter.bubenik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> Sender: categories@mta.ca
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: Peter Bubenik <peter.bubenik@gmail.com>
>
> Has anyone studied pairs of functors for which there exists a unit,
> but not a counit? Is there a name for such things?
>
> In the case of interest, the functors are between Cat and Met, the
> category of (extended pseudo-) metric spaces and 1-Lipschitz maps. The
> unit provides a characterization of certain coherent maps of metric
> spaces. Further details may be found in
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.07406.
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 23:26 Peter Bubenik
2016-11-15 21:44 ` Joost Vercruysse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1c75Ei-0006sI-0r@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=jvercruy@ulb.ac.be \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=peter.bubenik@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).