From: Gershom B <gershomb@gmail.com>
To: Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com>
Cc: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Functionally complete/universal basis for graph homomorphisms?
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:49:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1dxCiu-0001RE-Iv@mlist.mta.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1dwrt5-0004cr-IJ@mlist.mta.ca>
Dear Mike,
I don't have an answer for this precise question, but, assuming I
understand your question, I do have a reference for a general approach
that can provide a potential lower bound on the number of such
operations.
Take a look at "Homological Computations for Term Rewriting Systems"
by Philippe Malbos and Samuel Mimram:
http://math.univ-lyon1.fr/~malbos/Art/hcTRS.pdf
It uses some rather heavyweight abstract homology theory but produces
a purely mechanical procedure for obtaining results (though the
authors to my knowledge haven't yet implemented a computer program to
perform this automatically).
Cheers,
Gershom
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Mike Stay <metaweta@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Sheffer stroke / NAND gate suffices to implement any function from
> 2^n -> 2. I'm looking for a similar universal basis for graph
> homomorphisms from Omega^n -> Omega, where Omega is the subgraph
> classifier with two vertices t, f and five edges
>
> in:t->t, out1:t->t, out2:t->f, out3:f->t, out4:f->f.
>
> There's obviously a finite set of operations that covers all graph
> homomorphisms from Omega^n to Omega, because the set of all operations
> of that form is finite. But how small can that set be? I'd be
> satisfied with a formula parametric in n, but surprised if it actually
> depends on n; I'd expect it to be a finite set of binary operations.
>
> --
> Mike Stay - metaweta@gmail.com
> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~mike
> http://reperiendi.wordpress.com
>
>
> [For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-26 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-26 4:17 Mike Stay
2017-09-26 16:49 ` Gershom B [this message]
2017-09-27 4:28 ` Patrik Eklund
2017-09-28 5:50 ` Vaughan Pratt
2017-09-30 8:18 ` Patrik Eklund
2017-09-30 18:25 ` John Baez
2017-10-02 3:58 ` Vaughan Pratt
2017-09-27 21:26 ` Mike Stay
2017-09-28 21:18 ` John Baez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1dxCiu-0001RE-Iv@mlist.mta.ca \
--to=gershomb@gmail.com \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
--cc=metaweta@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).