categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Roberts <droberts.65537@gmail.com>
To: "categories@mta.ca list" <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Object of connected components for internal categories
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:39:42 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1jzkVL-0003gi-BP@rr.mta.ca> (raw)

Dear all,

I was wondering if there is any place in the literature that people
consider a hypothesis on a category E of the following form:

(*) For an internal category C in E, there is an object of connected
components pi_0(C).

This is equivalent to saying that s,t: Mor(C) ==> Obj(C) has a
coequaliser for any C.

One setup I know that is *sufficient* is if C is a sigma-pretopos (in
the language of the Elephant) aka an aleph_1-ary pretopos (in the
language of Shulman's exact completions article). This is a pretopos
that additionally has countable disjoint sums (rather than just
finite). This is sufficient because then we can take the underlying
internal graph of C, then form the corresponding relation, freely form
the associated symmetric, reflexive relation (this part so far only
requires the finitary structure) and then form the transitive closure
(this requires the countable sums).

However, given an internal category C I already have a transitive (and
reflexive) relation, namely the preorder reflection of C (which only
requires finitary operations). So while I don't necessarily expect any
other construction that doesn't require the countable sums, I was
wondering if people had considered this condition (*) directly and in
isolation. My best guess is it would be in some cohesion-type setup,
but I'm not interested in the rest of the cohesion axioms at this
time.

Many thanks,
David






David Roberts
Webpage: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/David+Roberts
Blog: https://thehighergeometer.wordpress.com


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-26  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-26  3:09 David Roberts [this message]
2020-07-27 11:13 ` ptj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1jzkVL-0003gi-BP@rr.mta.ca \
    --to=droberts.65537@gmail.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).