categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Barton <barton.neil.alexander@gmail.com>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: How does the logic of Set^P vary with the properties of P?
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:18:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1kn201-0003Uy-RC@rr.mta.ca> (raw)

Dear All,

I am very suspicious the answer to this (family of) question(s) is
well-known, but I couldn't find anything after a bit of searching so
I'll ask anyway.

(I've also tried asking on MathOverflow, if anyone is interested:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/378167/how-do-properties-of-a-partial-order-mathbbp-affect-the-logic-of-the-functo)

I am interested in how the logic associated with the algebra of
subobjects in the functor category Set^P (for a partial order P)
varies with different properties of P. Thus far, all I've been able to
find is:

Fact 1. P is (weakly) linearly-ordered iff the logic of the topos is
intuitionistic logic with the classical tautology (phi rightarrow psi)
vee (psi rightarrow phi) added (otherwise known as Dummett's Logic).

Fact 2. If P has a least element then the topos is disjunctive (i.e.
if y:1 to Omega and z:1 to Omega are truth-values, then y cup z = true
iff y = true or z = true). I *think* this implication can be reversed,
but I'm not sure.

I was wondering if anything more is known about how the logic of the
topos varies according to the properties of P (and vice versa)? I'd be
interested in any information here, but to make things more concrete,
is it known:

Q1. If the logic is affected when P is directed or has incompatible elements?

Q2. If P has incompatible elements, does the size of the largest
antichain matter?

Q3. What if P doesn't have a least element? (In particular can Fact
2's implication be reversed?)

Q4. P has (or doesn't have) a maximal element?

(An aside: In the presentation I'm most familiar with (namely
Goldblatt's book) there is a restriction that P be a small category. I
don't know whether this is essential for the results, or just made for
metamathematical ease/queasiness of dealing with a functor category
that can't be represented as anything small.)

Thanks for any pointers.

Best Wishes,

Neil


[For admin and other information see: http://www.mta.ca/~cat-dist/ ]


             reply	other threads:[~2020-12-05 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-05 21:18 Neil Barton [this message]
2020-12-09 19:12 ` ptj
2020-12-09 23:06 ` Steve Vickers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1kn201-0003Uy-RC@rr.mta.ca \
    --to=barton.neil.alexander@gmail.com \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).