* Naturality of a Change of Base Result
@ 2003-01-09 14:39 C.F.Townsend
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: C.F.Townsend @ 2003-01-09 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: categories
Given a geometric morphism n:E->F between Grothendieck toposes (over, say,
Set) E is both an F-indexed category and a Set-indexed category. There is
the following change of base result for any small (i.e. internal to Set)
category C: -
The category of F-indexed functors p^*C->E is equivalent to the category
of Set-indexed functors C->E (where the first E is as an F-indexed cat and
the second as a Set-indexed cat). (And p:F->Set.)
Is there anything published/known as to the naturality of this equivalence?
It is easy to see that it is natural in functors on C; but I also think (a)
that it may be natural with respect to filtred cocontinuous functors between
inductive completions of C and (b) between filtered cocontinuous functors on
E.
Thanks for any thoughts on this technical question,
Regards, Christopher Townsend (Open University).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-01-09 14:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-09 14:39 Naturality of a Change of Base Result C.F.Townsend
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).