From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/1714 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mamuka Jibladze Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: David Benson's questions on terminology Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:12:53 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: References: <3A24002A.2762B24B@stmarys.ca> Reply-To: Mamuka Jibladze NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018040 32555 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:14:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Wed Nov 29 12:26:52 2000 -0400 Return-Path: Original-Received: (from Majordom@localhost) by mailserv.mta.ca (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eATFn6U32756 for categories-list; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:49:06 -0400 (AST) X-Authentication-Warning: mailserv.mta.ca: Majordom set sender to cat-dist@mta.ca using -f In-Reply-To: <3A24002A.2762B24B@stmarys.ca> Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 45 Original-Lines: 23 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:1714 Archived-At: > I don't think David was trying to generalize the successor > relation in the sense of finding a "moral equivalent" in a poset for > the natural numbers' successor _function_. All he wants - I think - > is a notation for "a > b and there is no a>c>b". I would suggest > using an indefinite article with a noun formation: > > " a is _a_ successor of b" > > or a prepositional formation that does not connote uniqueness or > necessary existence: > > "a is immediately above b" > > Bob Pare and I used "