From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2733 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Prof. Peter Johnstone" Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Pullback & coproduct of toposes Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:49 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018860 5533 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:27:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:27:40 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Wed Jun 30 18:29:16 2004 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:29:16 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 1BfmYv-00012F-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:24:13 -0300 In-Reply-To: X-DPMMS-Scan-Signature: e26bfe9cfc17be7b1a279ab952802df2 Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 18 Original-Lines: 34 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2733 Archived-At: On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steve Lack wrote: > >I don't have access to a decent library at the moment, and I can't > >afford a copy of the Elephant myself, so can anyone let me know: > > > >In the category of toposes and geometric morphisms, under what > >conditions is coproduct stable under pullback? > > > > Answer: always. Let f:E-->S+S' be a morphism of toposes. Identify S+S' > with the product of the categories S and S'. Then in S+S' the terminal > object (1,1) is a coproduct (1,0)+(0,1). Now apply the inverse image > functor f* to obtain a decomposition 1=X_1+X_2 of the terminal object 1 > in E. By extensivity of E, then, the category E is equivalent to the > product E/X_1 x E/X_2; in other words, the topos E is the coproduct > of the toposes E/X_1 and E/X_2. (Where E/X_1 and E/X_2 are of course > the pullbacks along f of the injections S-->S+S' and S'-->S+S'.) > > This argument is contained in > > Marta Bunge & Stephen Lack, Van Kampen theorems for toposes, Adv. Math. > 179:291-317, 2003. > > where it is seen as part of the fact that the 2-category of toposes > is extensive. > ... and it is (of course) in the Elephant: page 402, remark following Lemma B3.4.1. Peter Johnstone