From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2733
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Prof. Peter Johnstone"
Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories
Subject: Re: Pullback & coproduct of toposes
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:49 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID:
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018860 5533 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:27:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:27:40 +0000 (UTC)
To: categories@mta.ca
Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Wed Jun 30 18:29:16 2004 -0300
Return-path:
Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:29:16 -0300
Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10)
id 1BfmYv-00012F-00
for categories-list@mta.ca; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:24:13 -0300
In-Reply-To:
X-DPMMS-Scan-Signature: e26bfe9cfc17be7b1a279ab952802df2
Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca
Precedence: bulk
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 18
Original-Lines: 34
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2733
Archived-At:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steve Lack wrote:
> >I don't have access to a decent library at the moment, and I can't
> >afford a copy of the Elephant myself, so can anyone let me know:
> >
> >In the category of toposes and geometric morphisms, under what
> >conditions is coproduct stable under pullback?
> >
>
> Answer: always. Let f:E-->S+S' be a morphism of toposes. Identify S+S'
> with the product of the categories S and S'. Then in S+S' the terminal
> object (1,1) is a coproduct (1,0)+(0,1). Now apply the inverse image
> functor f* to obtain a decomposition 1=X_1+X_2 of the terminal object 1
> in E. By extensivity of E, then, the category E is equivalent to the
> product E/X_1 x E/X_2; in other words, the topos E is the coproduct
> of the toposes E/X_1 and E/X_2. (Where E/X_1 and E/X_2 are of course
> the pullbacks along f of the injections S-->S+S' and S'-->S+S'.)
>
> This argument is contained in
>
> Marta Bunge & Stephen Lack, Van Kampen theorems for toposes, Adv. Math.
> 179:291-317, 2003.
>
> where it is seen as part of the fact that the 2-category of toposes
> is extensive.
>
... and it is (of course) in the Elephant: page 402, remark following
Lemma B3.4.1.
Peter Johnstone