categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Barry Jay's question
@ 1999-01-29 13:08 Michael Barr
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Barr @ 1999-01-29 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Categories list

Unless I am missing something, it seems to me that for any CCC C with
finite limits and any finite category I, the functor category C^I is a
CCC.  You can also replace finite by any cardinal if you do it in both
places.  The argument is roughly this.  Let |I| denote the discrete
category with the objects of I.  The inclusion |I| --> I induces U: C^I
--> C^{|I|} and the limits imply the existence of a right adjoint R of U.
Since U also preserves limits, the cotriple (UR,e,d) preserves finite
limits.  It is easy to see that U is cotripleable and that C^{|I|} is a
CCC and, hence, so is C^I.  For define A -o RC = R(UA -o C).  For a
general object B, the line B --> URB ==> URURB is an equalizer and you can
define A -o B as the equalizer of A -o URB ==> A -o URURB.  

Michael


-------------------------------------------------------------------
History shows that the human mind, fed by constant accessions of
knowledge, periodically grows too large for its theoretical coverings, and
bursts them asunder to appear in new habiliments, as the feeding and
growing grub, at intervals, casts its too narrow skin and assumes
another... Truly the imago state of Man seems to be terribly distant, but
every moult is a step gained. 

- Charles Darwin, from "The Origin of Species"




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~1999-01-29 13:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-01-29 13:08 Barry Jay's question Michael Barr

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).