From: Michael Barr <barr@barrs.org>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: Picard group of a ringoid
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:33:46 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012180819080.10047-100000@triples.math.mcgill.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200012170121.eBH1LIP10578@transbay.net>
I have never seen a name for this. I think, if it hasn't been defined
before, I would be inclined to call it the Morita group. There is a large
groupoid, let me call it the Morita groupoid, whose objects are rings and
for which a morphism R --> S is a left S, right R bimodule M such that
tensoring with M gives an equivalence between the category of left R
modules and left S modules. This is locally small since M must be a
finitely generated projective left S module and the group you are dealing
with is simply the group of endomorphisms of R in that groupoid. the
whole theory is due to Morita (and the main theorem, the Morita theorem).
This is for rings, of course. I assume that a ringoid is a small
preadditive category. A preadditive category with finitely many objects
is Morita equivalent to a ring so it will be true for them. Beyond that,
it would have to be examined because I am not sure what corresponds to
finitely generated.
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Bill Rowan wrote:
> Tensor product gives a monoid structure on the class of isomorphism types
> of R,R-bimodules, for a ring or ringoid R. Restricting to those elements
> for which there is a two-sided inverse yields a group. I am inclined to call
> this the nonabelian Picard group and denote it by NPic(R). If we start with
> a commutative ring R, then the usual Picard group of R, Pic(R), can be viewed
> as an abelian subgroup of NPic(R).
>
> Has anyone seen this before? Does anyone have some other idea about what this
> should be called?
>
> Bill Rowan
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-18 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-17 1:21 Bill Rowan
2000-12-18 13:33 ` Michael Barr [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.10.10012180819080.10047-100000@triples.math.mcgill.ca \
--to=barr@barrs.org \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).