categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Barr <barr@barrs.org>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: re: quantum logic
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:10:03 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131059530.3653-100000@triples.math.mcgill.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310122208.h9CM8sf26075@math-cl-n01.ucr.edu>

I think Rick Blute (+ collaborators) has done some things with this. It is
not clear whether you want a self-duality or a *-autonomous category.  If
you stick to finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, the situation seems
simple.  If V and W are inner product spaces, then for f, g: V --> W, let
f.g = \sum f(v_i).g(v_i) the sum taken over an orthonormal basis.  I
believe this is invariant to an orthonormal base change and it is
obviously positive definite.  For infinite dimensional spaces, you would
have to stick to f for which \sum f(v_i)^2 < oo.  But this isn't a
category.  It is closed under composition (I think) but certainly lacks
identities.  This gives rise to something called a nuclear category.  The
category has all maps and there is sub-non-category of nuclear maps.  This
all goes back (needless to say) to Grothendieck.

If by *-category you just mean self dual, well then Hilbert spaces
certainly are that.  Self dual categories are a dime a dozen.  Just take C
x C^op.  The amazing thing is that if C is closed, C x C^op is
*-autonomous, (assuming C has binary cartesian products).

Michael







  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-13 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-12 22:08 John Baez
2003-10-13 15:10 ` Michael Barr [this message]
2003-10-18 20:57 ` Michael Barr
2003-10-20 19:51   ` Toby Bartels
2003-10-22 16:01     ` Michael Barr
2003-10-22 20:14       ` Toby Bartels
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-22 18:07 Fred E.J. Linton
     [not found] ` <20031022201258.GF22371@math-rs-n03.ucr.edu>
2003-10-24  7:05   ` Fred E.J. Linton
2003-10-12  0:57 John Baez
2003-10-12 18:31 ` Robert Seely
2003-10-12 20:49 ` Michael Barr
2003-10-13 13:01 ` Pedro Resende
2003-10-13 13:21 ` Peter McBurney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131059530.3653-100000@triples.math.mcgill.ca \
    --to=barr@barrs.org \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).