From: Michael Barr <barr@barrs.org>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: re: quantum logic
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:10:03 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131059530.3653-100000@triples.math.mcgill.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310122208.h9CM8sf26075@math-cl-n01.ucr.edu>
I think Rick Blute (+ collaborators) has done some things with this. It is
not clear whether you want a self-duality or a *-autonomous category. If
you stick to finite dimensional Hilbert spaces, the situation seems
simple. If V and W are inner product spaces, then for f, g: V --> W, let
f.g = \sum f(v_i).g(v_i) the sum taken over an orthonormal basis. I
believe this is invariant to an orthonormal base change and it is
obviously positive definite. For infinite dimensional spaces, you would
have to stick to f for which \sum f(v_i)^2 < oo. But this isn't a
category. It is closed under composition (I think) but certainly lacks
identities. This gives rise to something called a nuclear category. The
category has all maps and there is sub-non-category of nuclear maps. This
all goes back (needless to say) to Grothendieck.
If by *-category you just mean self dual, well then Hilbert spaces
certainly are that. Self dual categories are a dime a dozen. Just take C
x C^op. The amazing thing is that if C is closed, C x C^op is
*-autonomous, (assuming C has binary cartesian products).
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-13 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-12 22:08 John Baez
2003-10-13 15:10 ` Michael Barr [this message]
2003-10-18 20:57 ` Michael Barr
2003-10-20 19:51 ` Toby Bartels
2003-10-22 16:01 ` Michael Barr
2003-10-22 20:14 ` Toby Bartels
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-22 18:07 Fred E.J. Linton
[not found] ` <20031022201258.GF22371@math-rs-n03.ucr.edu>
2003-10-24 7:05 ` Fred E.J. Linton
2003-10-12 0:57 John Baez
2003-10-12 18:31 ` Robert Seely
2003-10-12 20:49 ` Michael Barr
2003-10-13 13:01 ` Pedro Resende
2003-10-13 13:21 ` Peter McBurney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131059530.3653-100000@triples.math.mcgill.ca \
--to=barr@barrs.org \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).