From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2720
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Paul B Levy
Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories
Subject: Re: \phi for the golden ratio?
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 09:30:05 -0300
Message-ID:
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018850 5473 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:27:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:27:30 +0000 (UTC)
To: categories@mta.ca
Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Sun Jun 6 09:34:43 2004 -0300
Return-path:
Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca
Delivery-date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 09:34:43 -0300
Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10)
id 1BWwmr-0005Ae-00
for categories-list@mta.ca; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 09:30:05 -0300
In-Reply-To:
Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca
Precedence: bulk
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 5
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2720
Archived-At:
[note from moderator: this will be the last of this thread...]
> So far, I have only met three real or complex numbers with universally
> accepted one-letter symbols: \pi, e, i. Have I missed something?
What about "r" (pronounced "rev"), denoting 2*pi, in the archaic but still
widely understood phrase "33 rpm record"?
A shame the Greeks chose pi rather than rev, for I think the latter is
more fundamental.
Paul