From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2720 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul B Levy Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: \phi for the golden ratio? Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 09:30:05 -0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018850 5473 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:27:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:27:30 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Sun Jun 6 09:34:43 2004 -0300 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 09:34:43 -0300 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.10) id 1BWwmr-0005Ae-00 for categories-list@mta.ca; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 09:30:05 -0300 In-Reply-To: Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 5 Original-Lines: 16 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2720 Archived-At: [note from moderator: this will be the last of this thread...] > So far, I have only met three real or complex numbers with universally > accepted one-letter symbols: \pi, e, i. Have I missed something? What about "r" (pronounced "rev"), denoting 2*pi, in the archaic but still widely understood phrase "33 rpm record"? A shame the Greeks chose pi rather than rev, for I think the latter is more fundamental. Paul