From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/2900 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kirill Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: Schreier theory Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:36:59 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <437C9478.7010604@ll319dg.fsnet.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241018973 6294 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 15:29:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:29:33 +0000 (UTC) To: categories@mta.ca Original-X-From: rrosebru@mta.ca Fri Nov 25 17:10:33 2005 -0400 Return-path: Envelope-to: categories-list@mta.ca Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Majordom by mailserv.mta.ca with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EfkmY-0005KM-4R for categories-list@mta.ca; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:06:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <437C9478.7010604@ll319dg.fsnet.co.uk> Original-Sender: cat-dist@mta.ca Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 45 Original-Lines: 71 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:2900 Archived-At: On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Ronald Brown wrote: > > An interesting problem is to classify extensions of crossed complexes! > > There is an interesting account of extensions of principal bundles and > transitive Lie groupoids by Androulidakis, developing work of Mackenzie, > at math.DG/0402007 (not using crossed complexes). > Apropos the classification of extensions of principal bundles (equivalently, of locally trivial Lie groupoids) : The 1989 paper on extensions of principal bundles which Iakovos Androulidakis developed, @article { , AUTHOR = {Mackenzie, Kirill}, TITLE = {Classification of principal bundles and {L}ie groupoids with prescribed gauge group bundle}, JOURNAL = {J. Pure Appl. Algebra}, FJOURNAL = {Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra}, VOLUME = {58}, YEAR = {1989}, NUMBER = {2}, PAGES = {181--208}, ISSN = {0022-4049}, CODEN = {JPAAA2}, MRCLASS = {58H05 (20L05 22E99 55R15 58A99)}, } actually set out to demonstrate that non-abelian cohomology is _not_ needed for the classification. The standard classification of principal bundles P(M,G) with M, G given is by nonabelian H^1. My point was that it is at least equally interesting to classify possible P(M,G) with not just G prescribed, but the bundle of Lie groups associated to P through the inner automorphism action. This is variously called the gauge group bundle or (I think misleadingly) the adjoint group bundle. Given M and a bundle of Lie groups B on M, there is an obstruction class to the existence of a principal bundle P(M,G) with gauge group bundle B. If such a P exists then all possible such P are classified in the usual way by abelian cohomology. This approach extends in principle to general extensions of principal bundles. This approach arose because in the corresponding problem on the infinitesimal level, it is certainly more natural to classify transitive Lie algebroids with prescribed adjoint bundle. (The adjoint bundle of a transitive Lie algebroid is the kernel of the anchor map. For the Atiyah sequence of a principal bundle it is the bundle associated to P through the adjoint representation.) Kirill ============================================= Kirill C H Mackenzie Department of Pure Mathematics University of Sheffield Sheffield S3 7RH United Kingdom http://www.shef.ac.uk/~pm1kchm/ =============================================