From: Tom Fiore <fiore@math.uchicago.edu>
To: categories@mta.ca
Subject: Re: biadjoint biequivalences and spans in 2-categories
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:04:12 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808200345440.9565@math.uchicago.edu> (raw)
Hello,
Details of a part of John and Mike's post can be found in one of
my publications.
Theorem. 9.17
Let X and A be strict 2-categories, and G:A -> X a pseudo functor. There
exists a left biadjoint for G if and only if for every object x of X there
exists an object r of A and a biuniversal arrow x -> Gr from x to G.
The proof is as one could expect.
http://arxiv.org/abs/math.CT/0408298
Fiore, Thomas M. Pseudo limits, biadjoints, and pseudo algebras:
categorical foundations of conformal field theory. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.
182 (2006), no. 860, x+171 pp.
Best greetings,
Tom
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Michael Shulman wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Answers to both this and your previous question about biadjoint
> biequivalences are at least asserted in Street's "Fibrations in
> Bicategories".
>
> At the end of section 1, he defines a functor (=homomorphism) to have a
> left biadjoint if each object has a left bilifting, to be a biequivalence
> if it is biessentially surjective and locally fully faithful, and states
> that "clearly a biequivalence T has a left biadjoint S which is also a
> biequivalence".
>
> At the beginning of section 3 he defines a bicategory of spans from A to
> B in any bicategory, and given finite bilimits, essentially describes
> how to construct what one might call an "unbiased tricategory" of spans
> (of course, the definition of tricategory didn't exist at the time).
>
> He doesn't give any details of the proofs, but one could probably
> construct a detailed proof from these ideas without much more than
> tedium. I don't know whether anyone has written them out.
>
> Best,
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:45:12AM -0700, John Baez wrote:
>> Dear Categorists -
>>
>> Given a category C with pullbacks we can define a bicategory Span(C)
>> where objects are objects of C, morphisms are spans - composed
>> using pullback - and 2-morphisms are maps between spans.
>>
>> Have people tried to categorify this yet?
>>
>> Suppose we have a 2-category C with pseudo-pullbacks. Then we should
>> be able to define a tricategory Span(C). Has someone done this?
>>
>> Or maybe people have gotten some partial results, e.g. in the case
>> where C = Cat. I'd like to know about these!
>>
>> Best,
>> jb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-20 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-20 9:04 Tom Fiore [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-20 6:56 Richard Garner
2008-08-19 18:11 Michael Shulman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0808200345440.9565@math.uchicago.edu \
--to=fiore@math.uchicago.edu \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).