From: categories <cat-dist@mta.ca>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: Re: Lax Indexed Functors?
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:14:32 -0400 (AST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.90.970131141417.9518A-100000@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 14:48:30 GMT
From: Sandro Fusco <sfusco@mathstat.yorku.ca>
On Jan 29, 4:05pm, categories wrote:
> Subject: Lax Indexed Functors?
> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:58:44 +0100 (MET)
> From: Alfio Martini <alfio@cs.tu-berlin.de>
>
> To give an impression about what we are doing,
> I will give the definition that turns out to be the
> adequate one for our purposes:
>
> A lax indexed functor F from an indexed category C:IND->CAT to an
> indexed category D:IND->CAT is given by functors F(i):C(i)->D(i) for
> each i in |IND| and by natural transformations F(g):C(g);F(j)=>F(i);D(g)
> for each morphism g:i->j in IND such that the following compositionality
> condition is satisfied for any g:i->j and h:j->k in IND:
>
> F(g;h) = (C(g);F(h))*(F(g);D(h)). --------(1)
>
>
> To get the right feeling and insight we have developed all necessary
> results by ourselves. Especially we were interested in the generalization
> of the Grothendieck construction to "lax indexed functors".
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> With all best wishes,
>
> Alfio Martini.
>
>
>-- End of excerpt from categories
Greetings!
Concerning Alfio Martini's message, I would like to point out that I have
been using a similar notion of what I also called "lax indexed functors".
The only difference is that instead of condition (1) I have the following:
(\Phi_g,h ; F(k)) * F(g;h) = (C(g);F(h)) * (F(g);D(h)) * (F(i) ; \Phi'_g,h)
where \Phi_g,h:C(g);C(h)->C(g;h) is the natural isomorphism associated
with the indexed category C and \Phi'_g,h is the natural isomorphism
associated with D (the reason being that my indexed categories
C, D: IND->CAT are basically pseudofunctors).
As shown in my thesis abstract below, a generalized Grothendieck
construction is established.
I expect to have copies of my thesis available by the end of April 1997.
Yours truly,
Sandro Fusco
-------------
Doctoral Thesis
Title:
Stable Functors and the Grothendieck Construction.
Abstract:
In classical domain theory, Scott-continuous functions of partially ordered
sets (posets) are used to model approximation processes. When replacing
posets by (the more general) categories, the so called "stable functors" take
on the role of Scott-continuous functions. Different notions of stable functors
were studied intensively by various researchers during the past ten years
(notably by Paul Taylor of Imperial College, London, and Walter Tholen of
York University, Toronto). These notions are closely related to generalizations
of two fundamental notions of category theory, adjoint functors, and
fibrations, with no apparent link between the two approaches.
In this thesis, we
1. introduce and investigate a satisfactory notion and theory of stable
functors based on "factorizations relative to a functor" (as given by
both, generalized adjoints and fibrations);
2. establish the Grothendieck construction as a 2-functor \Gamma whose
domain is the 2-category of \{cal X}-indexed categories and whose target
is the suitably defined 2-category of stable functors with codomain \{cal X},
in such a way that \Gamma is part of a higher-dimensional adjunction.
This latter part can be exploited at various levels of generality, yielding in
particular the well-known equivalence between \{cal X}-indexed categories and
cloven fibrations.
--
Sandro Fusco <sfusco@mathstat.yorku.ca>
Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics
York University
North York, Ontario
Canada M3J 1P3
Tel: (416) 736-2100 Ext. 40617
Fax: (416) 736-5757
next reply other threads:[~1997-01-31 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-01-31 18:14 categories [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-01-29 20:05 categories
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.OSF.3.90.970131141417.9518A-100000@mailserv.mta.ca \
--to=cat-dist@mta.ca \
--cc=categories@mta.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).