From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.science.mathematics.categories/443 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: categories Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories Subject: Re: functions Omega->Omega Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 20:25:22 -0300 (ADT) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241016970 25782 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2009 14:56:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:56:10 +0000 (UTC) To: categories Original-X-From: cat-dist Mon Jul 14 20:26:17 1997 Original-Received: by mailserv.mta.ca; id AA14261; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 20:25:22 -0300 Original-Lines: 29 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.science.mathematics.categories:443 Archived-At: Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 14:24:43 -0400 From: Philip J. Scott >Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 16:56:25 -0400 (EDT) >From: Andre Scedrov > > > > f(a) & a = f(true) & a > > > > I wonder whether anyone has noticed this formula before? > >Similar formulas and their analogs in intuitionistic second-order >propositional calculus are discussed in my paper in the Annals Pure >Appl. Logic 27 (1984) 155-164. That paper was motivated by Higgs's >observation that every monic Omega -> Omega in a topos is an involution, >see Peter Johnstone's paper "Automorphisms of Omega" in Alg. Universalis >9 (1979) 1-7. > > Andre Scedrov For a logical proof of Higgs' theorem, based on the above observations of Scedrov, see Lambek-Scott (Introd. to Higher Order Cat. Logic), p.160, Exercise 4. A further result along these lines is in Lemma 12.3, p. 190 of our book. Phil Scott