categories - Category Theory list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: categories <cat-dist@mta.ca>
To: categories <categories@mta.ca>
Subject: "weakened" operads
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 21:11:24 -0400 (AST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.90.971118211114.1802K-100000@mailserv.mta.ca> (raw)

Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 16:07:01 -0800 (PST)
From: john baez <baez@math.ucr.edu>

In their book "Homotopy invariant structures on topological structures",
Boardman and Vogt construct from any topological operad O a new one WO,
which can be thought of as a "weakened" version of O in which all the
laws of O now hold only up to homotopy in a coherent way.  

Has there been any subsequent work clarifying this construction?  Here
I'm not interested so much in all the *other* approaches to infinite
loop space machines, as in the notion of "weakening" a topological
operad.  For example, Boardman and Vogt point out that their construction
can be used to discuss homotopy colimits, which makes me wonder if the
construction of WO from O could be done slickly using homotopy colimits.
Has anyone discussed this?

Best,
John Baez




             reply	other threads:[~1997-11-19  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-11-19  1:11 categories [this message]
1997-11-20 19:51 categories

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.OSF.3.90.971118211114.1802K-100000@mailserv.mta.ca \
    --to=cat-dist@mta.ca \
    --cc=categories@mta.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).